DFND vs. DDIV
DFND (Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF) and DDIV (First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFND is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index, while DDIV is a Momentum fund tracking the Dorsey Wright Momentum Plus Dividend Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DFND returned 7.15%/yr vs 10.06%/yr for DDIV. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DFND charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for DDIV.
Performance
DFND vs. DDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
Over the past 10 years, DFND has underperformed DDIV with an annualized return of 7.15%, while DDIV has yielded a comparatively higher 10.06% annualized return.
DFND
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 2.16%
- 3Y*
- 8.10%
- 5Y*
- 4.54%
- 10Y*
- 7.15%
DDIV
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- -0.40%
- YTD
- 8.45%
- 6M
- 6.85%
- 1Y
- 22.50%
- 3Y*
- 20.89%
- 5Y*
- 10.45%
- 10Y*
- 10.06%
DFND vs. DDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF | 0.00% | 10.37% | 8.48% | 12.13% | -19.59% | 14.80% | 16.12% | 19.53% | -1.83% | 16.33% |
DDIV First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF | 8.45% | 12.23% | 27.18% | 9.95% | -12.44% | 39.96% | -3.59% | 32.40% | -16.50% | 11.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFND and DDIV is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2016 | 0.35 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DFND and DDIV has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.35, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
DFND vs. DDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFND
DDIV
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Technology
DFND
DDIV
Financial Services
DFND
DDIV
Industrials
DFND
DDIV
Healthcare
DFND
DDIV
Basic Materials
DFND
DDIV
Consumer Defensive
DFND
DDIV
Consumer Cyclical
DFND
DDIV
Real Estate
DFND
DDIV
Energy
DFND
DDIV
Communication Services
DFND
DDIV
Utilities
DFND
-
DDIV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFND vs. DDIV — Risk / Return Rank
DFND
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DDIV
DFND vs. DDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) and First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF (DDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFND | DDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.28 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.60 | 2.00 | -1.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.08 | 7.34 | -6.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFND vs. DDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFND drawdown since its inception was -22.65%, smaller than the maximum DDIV drawdown of -47.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFND and DDIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFND | DDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.65% | -47.56% | +24.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.44% | -11.31% | +7.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.56% | -18.97% | +6.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.65% | -21.10% | -1.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.65% | -47.56% | +24.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.69% | -1.06% | -2.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.70% | -6.00% | +0.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.72% | 3.07% | +0.65% |
Volatility
DFND vs. DDIV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) is 0.00%, while First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF (DDIV) has a volatility of 3.10%. This indicates that DFND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFND | DDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 3.10% | -3.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.10% | 11.65% | -5.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.88% | 14.39% | -3.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.44% | 18.54% | +3.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.08% | 19.92% | -0.84% |
DFND vs. DDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFND has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than DDIV's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFND vs. DDIV - Dividend Comparison
DFND has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDIV First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF | 1.59% | 1.94% | 2.22% | 3.18% | 3.60% | 2.43% | 2.63% | 2.93% | 3.27% | 0.00% |
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF | 0.62% | 1.10% | 1.64% | 1.84% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.77% | 0.53% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFND and DDIV have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DDIV has higher volatility (3.10%) compared to DFND (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFND dropped -22.65% vs DDIV's -47.56%.
On 10-year performance, DDIV leads with 10.06% vs 7.15% for DFND. On fees, DDIV is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, DFND has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DDIV has performed better with a 10.06% return vs 7.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DDIV is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DFND.
DDIV has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 0.62% for DFND.
DFND is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DDIV is Momentum. DFND tracks Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index, while DDIV tracks Dorsey Wright Momentum Plus Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: SRN Advisors and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for DFND and 0.60% for DDIV.
DDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFND and DDIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer