PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFND vs. DDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFND vs. DDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) and First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF (DDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DFND

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DDIV

1D
0.88%
1M
2.75%
6M
9.42%
YTD
12.53%
1Y
23.80%
3Y*
20.05%
5Y*
11.45%
10Y*
9.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFND vs. DDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFND
Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF
0.00%10.37%8.48%12.13%-19.59%14.80%16.12%19.53%-1.83%16.33%
DDIV
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF
12.53%12.23%27.18%9.95%-12.44%39.96%-3.59%32.40%-16.50%11.31%

Correlation

The correlation between DFND and DDIV is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2016

0.35

Over the past year, the correlation between DFND and DDIV has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.35, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DFND vs. DDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFND
DDIV

Technology

24.8%
1.0%

Financial Services

18.2%
22.2%

Industrials

17.1%
6.4%

Healthcare

10.7%
4.0%

Basic Materials

4.3%
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

3.5%
5.4%

Real Estate

2.0%
15.4%

Energy

1.7%
27.0%

Communication Services

0.8%
2.8%

Utilities

-

5.2%

Technology

DFND
24.8%
DDIV
1.0%

Financial Services

DFND
18.2%
DDIV
22.2%

Industrials

DFND
17.1%
DDIV
6.4%

Healthcare

DFND
10.7%
DDIV
4.0%

Basic Materials

DFND
4.3%
DDIV
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

DFND
4.2%
DDIV
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

DFND
3.5%
DDIV
5.4%

Real Estate

DFND
2.0%
DDIV
15.4%

Energy

DFND
1.7%
DDIV
27.0%

Communication Services

DFND
0.8%
DDIV
2.8%

Utilities

DFND

-

DDIV
5.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFND vs. DDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFND

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


DDIV
DDIV Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
DDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
DDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFND vs. DDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) and First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF (DDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFNDDDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.77

DFND vs. DDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFND vs. DDIV - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFNDDDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

Volatility

DFND vs. DDIV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFNDDDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.89%

DFND vs. DDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFND has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than DDIV's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFND vs. DDIV - Dividend Comparison

DFND has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DDIV
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF
1.55%1.94%2.22%3.18%3.60%2.43%2.63%2.93%3.27%0.00%
DFND
Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF
0.29%1.10%1.64%1.84%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.77%0.53%0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFND and DDIV have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DDIV is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DDIV is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DFND.

DDIV has the higher dividend yield at 1.55%, compared with 0.29% for DFND.

DFND is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DDIV is Momentum. DFND tracks Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index, while DDIV tracks Dorsey Wright Momentum Plus Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: SRN Advisors and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for DFND and 0.60% for DDIV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFND and DDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer