DFND vs. BDGS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DFND (Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF) and BDGS (Bridges Capital Tactical ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. DFND is passively managed, while BDGS is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFND returned 7.91%/yr vs 14.06%/yr for BDGS. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DFND charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for BDGS.

Performance

DFND vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

DFND

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: -1.09%
• 1Y: 0.20%
• 3Y*: 7.91%
• 5Y*: 4.54%
• 10Y*: 7.16%

BDGS

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 1.26%
• YTD: 5.64%
• 6M: 5.65%
• 1Y: 13.85%
• 3Y*: 14.06%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFND vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF	0.00%	10.37%	8.48%	7.36%
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	5.64%	10.61%	19.07%	8.31%

Correlation

The correlation between DFND and BDGS is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2023	0.17

DFND vs. BDGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DFND	BDGS
Technology	24.8%	37.4%
Financial Services	18.2%	9.3%
Industrials	17.1%	6.6%
Healthcare	10.7%	7.5%
Basic Materials	4.3%	1.5%
Consumer Defensive	4.2%	4.1%
Consumer Cyclical	3.5%	10.9%
Real Estate	2.0%	1.5%
Energy	1.7%	2.6%
Communication Services	0.8%	16.6%
Utilities	-	1.9%

Return for Risk

DFND vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFND

DFND Risk / Return Rank: 9
DFND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
DFND Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
DFND Omega Ratio Rank: 8
DFND Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
DFND Martin Ratio Rank: 9

BDGS

BDGS Risk / Return Rank: 74
BDGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
BDGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
BDGS Omega Ratio Rank: 78
BDGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
BDGS Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFND vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DFND	BDGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.02	2.29	-2.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.11	3.40	-3.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.47	-0.46
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.07	3.45	-3.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.13	16.47	-16.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DFND vs. BDGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFND Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is lower than the BDGS Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFND and BDGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DFND	BDGS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02	2.29	-2.27
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.38	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	1.76	-1.40

Drawdowns

DFND vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFND drawdown since its inception was -22.65%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFND and BDGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFND	BDGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.65%	-9.12%	-13.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.44%	-4.03%	+0.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.56%	-9.12%	-3.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.65%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.65%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.69%	-0.83%	-2.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.70%	-0.64%	-5.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.70%	0.84%	+2.86%

Volatility

DFND vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) is 0.00%, while Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) has a volatility of 1.14%. This indicates that DFND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFND	BDGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.00%	1.14%	-1.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.16%	4.74%	+1.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.92%	6.08%	+4.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.46%	8.21%	+14.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.09%	8.21%	+10.88%

DFND vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFND has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BDGS's 0.87% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFND vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

DFND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, more than BDGS's 0.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	0.52%	0.55%	1.81%	0.84%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF	0.62%	1.10%	1.64%	1.84%	0.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.77%	0.53%	0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFND and BDGS in my portfolio?

DFND and BDGS have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DFND or BDGS?

BDGS has higher volatility (1.14%) compared to DFND (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFND dropped -22.65% vs BDGS's -9.12%.

Which ETF is better, DFND or BDGS?

On 3-year performance, BDGS leads with 14.06% vs 7.91% for DFND. On fees, BDGS is cheaper at 0.87% per year. On volatility, DFND has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DFND or BDGS?

Over the 3-year period, BDGS has performed better with a 14.06% return vs 7.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DFND or BDGS?

BDGS is cheaper with a 0.87% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DFND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DFND or BDGS?

DFND has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.52% for BDGS.

What is the main difference between DFND and BDGS?

They also come from different issuers: SRN Advisors and Bridges. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for DFND and 0.87% for BDGS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BDGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.