PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFMC vs. XOP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFMC vs. XOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional US Micro Cap Portfolio ETF (DFMC) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DFMC

1D
-1.12%
1M
1.77%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XOP

1D
1.35%
1M
-5.46%
YTD
36.08%
6M
26.81%
1Y
41.73%
3Y*
14.10%
5Y*
14.86%
10Y*
3.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFMC vs. XOP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DFMC and XOP is -0.54, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2026

-0.54

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFMC vs. XOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFMC

XOP
XOP Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
XOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOP Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
XOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOP Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFMC vs. XOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Micro Cap Portfolio ETF (DFMC) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DFMC vs. XOP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFMCXOPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.79

0.06

+4.73

Drawdowns

DFMC vs. XOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFMC drawdown since its inception was -4.29%, smaller than the maximum XOP drawdown of -90.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFMC and XOP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFMCXOPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.29%

-90.27%

+85.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-82.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.12%

-36.40%

+35.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.84%

-42.59%

+41.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.90%

Volatility

DFMC vs. XOP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFMCXOPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.19%

27.81%

-11.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.19%

33.88%

-17.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.19%

40.28%

-24.09%

DFMC vs. XOP - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFMC has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than XOP's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFMC vs. XOP - Dividend Comparison

DFMC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFMC
Dimensional US Micro Cap Portfolio ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XOP
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
1.90%2.62%2.45%2.63%2.47%1.61%2.34%1.47%0.99%0.76%0.76%2.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFMC and XOP have a correlation of -0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XOP is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XOP is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for DFMC.

XOP has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 0.00% for DFMC.

DFMC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while XOP is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional Fund Advisors and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for DFMC and 0.35% for XOP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFMC and XOP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer