DFMC vs. XOP
DFMC (Dimensional US Micro Cap Portfolio ETF) and XOP (SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFMC is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional Fund Advisors, while XOP is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry. DFMC is actively managed, while XOP is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.54, they often move in opposite directions. DFMC charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XOP.
Performance
DFMC vs. XOP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DFMC
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- 1.77%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XOP
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- -5.46%
- YTD
- 36.08%
- 6M
- 26.81%
- 1Y
- 41.73%
- 3Y*
- 14.10%
- 5Y*
- 14.86%
- 10Y*
- 3.80%
DFMC vs. XOP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DFMC Dimensional US Micro Cap Portfolio ETF | 11.97% |
XOP SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF | -2.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFMC and XOP is -0.54, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2026 | -0.54 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFMC vs. XOP — Risk / Return Rank
DFMC
XOP
DFMC vs. XOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Micro Cap Portfolio ETF (DFMC) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFMC | XOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.79 | 0.06 | +4.73 |
Drawdowns
DFMC vs. XOP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFMC drawdown since its inception was -4.29%, smaller than the maximum XOP drawdown of -90.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFMC and XOP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFMC | XOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.29% | -90.27% | +85.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -34.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -82.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.12% | -36.40% | +35.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.84% | -42.59% | +41.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.90% | — |
Volatility
DFMC vs. XOP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFMC | XOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.03% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 21.64% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.19% | 27.81% | -11.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.19% | 33.88% | -17.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.19% | 40.28% | -24.09% |
DFMC vs. XOP - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFMC has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than XOP's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFMC vs. XOP - Dividend Comparison
DFMC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFMC Dimensional US Micro Cap Portfolio ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XOP SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF | 1.90% | 2.62% | 2.45% | 2.63% | 2.47% | 1.61% | 2.34% | 1.47% | 0.99% | 0.76% | 0.76% | 2.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFMC and XOP have a correlation of -0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XOP is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XOP is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for DFMC.
XOP has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 0.00% for DFMC.
DFMC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while XOP is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional Fund Advisors and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for DFMC and 0.35% for XOP.
Find the right allocation for DFMC and XOP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer