DFMC vs. DES
DFMC (Dimensional US Micro Cap Portfolio ETF) and DES (WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. DFMC is actively managed, while DES is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DFMC charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for DES.
Performance
DFMC vs. DES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DFMC
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 4.99%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DES
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- YTD
- 18.52%
- 6M
- 16.64%
- 1Y
- 30.08%
- 3Y*
- 15.54%
- 5Y*
- 7.29%
- 10Y*
- 8.48%
DFMC vs. DES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DFMC Dimensional US Micro Cap Portfolio ETF | 17.57% |
DES WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund | 13.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFMC and DES is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2026 | 0.92 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFMC vs. DES — Risk / Return Rank
DFMC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DES
DFMC vs. DES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Micro Cap Portfolio ETF (DFMC) and WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund (DES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFMC | DES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.95 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.33 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFMC vs. DES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFMC drawdown since its inception was -4.29%, smaller than the maximum DES drawdown of -65.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFMC and DES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFMC | DES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.29% | -65.48% | +61.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.16% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.16% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.62% | +1.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.76% | -9.66% | +8.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.66% | — |
Volatility
DFMC vs. DES - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFMC | DES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.92% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.11% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.31% | 16.48% | -0.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.31% | 19.51% | -3.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.31% | 21.98% | -5.67% |
DFMC vs. DES - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFMC has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than DES's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFMC vs. DES - Dividend Comparison
DFMC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DES WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund | 2.33% | 2.85% | 2.81% | 2.65% | 2.89% | 2.31% | 2.75% | 2.68% | 3.65% | 2.89% | 2.70% | 3.09% |
DFMC Dimensional US Micro Cap Portfolio ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, DFMC and DES move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, DES is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DES is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for DFMC.
DES has the higher dividend yield at 2.33%, compared with 0.00% for DFMC.
They also come from different issuers: Dimensional Fund Advisors and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for DFMC and 0.38% for DES.
Find the right allocation for DFMC and DES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer