PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFMC vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFMC vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional US Micro Cap Portfolio ETF (DFMC) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DFMC

1D
0.56%
1M
1.89%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VOO

1D
0.14%
1M
5.39%
YTD
11.69%
6M
12.11%
1Y
29.68%
3Y*
22.73%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
15.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFMC vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DFMC and VOO is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2026

0.76

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFMC vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFMC

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFMC vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Micro Cap Portfolio ETF (DFMC) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DFMC vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFMCVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

5.64

0.89

+4.75

Drawdowns

DFMC vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFMC drawdown since its inception was -4.29%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFMC and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFMCVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.29%

-33.99%

+29.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.83%

-3.69%

+2.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

Volatility

DFMC vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFMCVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.05%

11.78%

+4.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.05%

16.81%

-0.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.05%

18.01%

-1.96%

DFMC vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFMC has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFMC vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

DFMC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFMC
Dimensional US Micro Cap Portfolio ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.02%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFMC and VOO have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for DFMC.

VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.00% for DFMC.

DFMC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional Fund Advisors and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for DFMC and 0.03% for VOO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFMC and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer