DFMC vs. VOO
DFMC (Dimensional US Micro Cap Portfolio ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFMC is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional Fund Advisors, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. DFMC is actively managed, while VOO is passively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFMC charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
DFMC vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DFMC
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VOO
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- YTD
- 8.19%
- 6M
- 7.24%
- 1Y
- 23.69%
- 3Y*
- 20.78%
- 5Y*
- 13.13%
- 10Y*
- 15.61%
DFMC vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DFMC Dimensional US Micro Cap Portfolio ETF | 17.63% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 13.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFMC and VOO is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2026 | 0.74 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFMC vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
DFMC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VOO
DFMC vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Micro Cap Portfolio ETF (DFMC) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFMC | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.35 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.67 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.96 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFMC vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFMC drawdown since its inception was -4.29%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFMC and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFMC | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.29% | -33.99% | +29.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.14% | +3.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.74% | -3.68% | +2.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.99% | — |
Volatility
DFMC vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFMC | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.83% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.82% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.18% | 12.46% | +3.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.18% | 16.91% | -0.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.18% | 18.02% | -1.84% |
DFMC vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFMC has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFMC vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
DFMC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFMC Dimensional US Micro Cap Portfolio ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.05% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFMC and VOO have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for DFMC.
VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.00% for DFMC.
DFMC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional Fund Advisors and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for DFMC and 0.03% for VOO.
Find the right allocation for DFMC and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer