PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFMC vs. DEXC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFMC vs. DEXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional US Micro Cap Portfolio ETF (DFMC) and Dimensional Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity ETF (DEXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DFMC

1D
-0.20%
1M
-0.45%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

DEXC

1D
0.21%
1M
-6.85%
6M
13.02%
YTD
22.11%
1Y
39.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
28.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.25M$1.39M$1.60M
$1.07M$1.53M$1.78M

DFMC vs. DEXC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DFMC and DEXC is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2026

0.61

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFMC vs. DEXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DFMC

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


DEXC
DEXC Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
DEXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEXC Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
DEXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEXC Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DFMC vs. DEXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Micro Cap Portfolio ETF (DFMC) and Dimensional Emerging Markets ex China Core Equity ETF (DEXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFMCDEXCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.09

DFMC vs. DEXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFMC vs. DEXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFMC drawdown since its inception was -4.29%, smaller than the maximum DEXC drawdown of -18.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFMC and DEXC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFMCDEXCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.29%

-18.31%

+14.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.84%

-14.30%

+12.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.91%

-2.92%

+2.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.79%

Volatility

DFMC vs. DEXC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFMCDEXCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.15%

25.90%

-10.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.15%

22.68%

-7.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.15%

22.68%

-7.53%

DFMC vs. DEXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFMC has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than DEXC's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFMC vs. DEXC - Dividend Comparison

DFMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than DEXC's 1.67% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


DFMC and DEXC have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DFMC is cheaper at 0.41% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DFMC is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for DEXC.

DEXC has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 0.22% for DFMC.

DFMC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while DEXC is Emerging Markets Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for DFMC and 0.43% for DEXC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFMC and DEXC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer