DFLV vs. VTI
DFLV (Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFLV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while VTI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index. DFLV is actively managed, while VTI is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFLV returned 19.86%/yr vs 22.37%/yr for VTI. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFLV charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTI.
Performance
DFLV vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFLV achieves a 16.80% return, which is significantly higher than VTI's 11.72% return.
DFLV
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 4.82%
- YTD
- 16.80%
- 6M
- 18.40%
- 1Y
- 35.08%
- 3Y*
- 19.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTI
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 4.59%
- YTD
- 11.72%
- 6M
- 11.43%
- 1Y
- 28.79%
- 3Y*
- 22.37%
- 5Y*
- 12.80%
- 10Y*
- 15.04%
DFLV vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFLV Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF | 16.80% | 15.90% | 12.88% | 12.31% | -0.67% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 11.72% | 17.10% | 23.81% | 26.05% | -2.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFLV and VTI is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2022 | 0.78 |
The correlation between DFLV and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
DFLV vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFLV
VTI
Financial Services
Energy
Healthcare
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Real Estate
Utilities
-
Financial Services
DFLV
VTI
Energy
DFLV
VTI
Healthcare
DFLV
VTI
Industrials
DFLV
VTI
Technology
DFLV
VTI
Consumer Cyclical
DFLV
VTI
Basic Materials
DFLV
VTI
Consumer Defensive
DFLV
VTI
Communication Services
DFLV
VTI
Real Estate
DFLV
VTI
Utilities
DFLV
-
VTI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFLV vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank
DFLV
VTI
DFLV vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF (DFLV) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFLV | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 1.43 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.43 | 3.24 | +3.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.59 | 14.94 | +7.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFLV | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.15 | 2.38 | +0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.17 | 0.51 | +0.66 |
Drawdowns
DFLV vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFLV drawdown since its inception was -16.80%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFLV and VTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFLV | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.80% | -55.45% | +38.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.48% | -8.92% | +3.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.80% | -19.30% | +2.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.26% | +0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.07% | -8.03% | +4.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.56% | 1.93% | -0.37% |
Volatility
DFLV vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF (DFLV) is 2.61%, while Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) has a volatility of 2.90%. This indicates that DFLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFLV | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.61% | 2.90% | -0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.10% | 9.13% | -1.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.22% | 12.17% | -0.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.20% | 17.40% | -3.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.20% | 18.30% | -4.10% |
DFLV vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFLV has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DFLV vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
DFLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, more than VTI's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFLV Dimensional US Large Cap Value ETF | 1.39% | 1.61% | 1.65% | 1.72% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.01% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFLV and VTI have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VTI has higher volatility (2.90%) compared to DFLV (2.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFLV dropped -16.80% vs VTI's -55.45%.
On 3-year performance, VTI leads with 22.37% vs 19.86% for DFLV. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, DFLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VTI has performed better with a 22.37% return vs 19.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for DFLV.
DFLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.39%, compared with 1.01% for VTI.
DFLV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for DFLV and 0.03% for VTI.
DFLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.15 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFLV and VTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer