PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFIV vs. DFAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DFIV vs. DFAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) and Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DFIV vs. DFAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DFIV
Dimensional International Value ETF
5.98%45.36%7.26%17.75%-3.70%0.08%
DFAU
Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF
-3.36%16.78%23.17%24.79%-16.99%6.51%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFIV achieves a 5.98% return, which is significantly higher than DFAU's -3.36% return.


DFIV

1D
2.74%
1M
-5.65%
YTD
5.98%
6M
15.53%
1Y
38.38%
3Y*
22.24%
5Y*
10Y*

DFAU

1D
2.90%
1M
-4.90%
YTD
-3.36%
6M
-0.90%
1Y
18.61%
3Y*
17.54%
5Y*
11.00%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DFIV vs. DFAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFIV has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAU's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

DFIV vs. DFAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFIV
DFIV Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
DFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
DFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

DFAU
DFAU Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
DFAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAU Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAU Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFIV vs. DFAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) and Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFIVDFAUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.25

1.01

+1.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.94

1.53

+1.41

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.23

+0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

1.54

+1.53

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.72

7.40

+6.32

DFIV vs. DFAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is higher than the DFAU Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFIV and DFAU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFIVDFAUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

1.01

+1.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.79

+0.10

Correlation

The correlation between DFIV and DFAU is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

DFIV vs. DFAU - Dividend Comparison

DFIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than DFAU's 1.03% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
DFIV
Dimensional International Value ETF
2.69%2.92%3.88%3.93%3.84%2.30%0.00%
DFAU
Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF
1.03%0.95%1.10%1.29%1.40%1.00%0.13%

Drawdowns

DFIV vs. DFAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFIV drawdown since its inception was -25.42%, which is greater than DFAU's maximum drawdown of -23.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFIV and DFAU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DFIVDFAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.42%

-23.61%

-1.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.12%

-12.45%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.95%

-6.03%

+0.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.58%

-5.12%

+0.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.72%

2.60%

+0.12%

Volatility

DFIV vs. DFAU - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) has a higher volatility of 6.81% compared to Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) at 5.37%. This indicates that DFIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DFIVDFAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.81%

5.37%

+1.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.46%

9.65%

+0.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.16%

18.51%

-1.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.71%

17.04%

-0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.71%

16.88%

-0.17%