DFII vs. KNG
DFII (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF) and KNG (FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFII is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by First Trust, while KNG is a Dividend fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Index Monthly Series. DFII is actively managed, while KNG is passively managed. Over the past year, DFII returned -37.26% vs 7.44% for KNG. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DFII charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for KNG.
Performance
DFII vs. KNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFII achieves a -24.78% return, which is significantly lower than KNG's 2.20% return.
DFII
- 1D
- -2.65%
- 1M
- -17.17%
- YTD
- -24.78%
- 6M
- -28.08%
- 1Y
- -37.26%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KNG
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 2.20%
- 6M
- 2.33%
- 1Y
- 7.44%
- 3Y*
- 7.06%
- 5Y*
- 4.31%
- 10Y*
- —
DFII vs. KNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DFII FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF | -24.78% | 5.61% |
KNG FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF | 2.20% | 5.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFII and KNG is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFII vs. KNG — Risk / Return Rank
DFII
KNG
DFII vs. KNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF (DFII) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFII | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.13 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | 0.87 | -1.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.38 | 2.25 | -3.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFII | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.91 | 0.73 | -1.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.44 | 0.49 | -0.93 |
Drawdowns
DFII vs. KNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFII drawdown since its inception was -48.07%, which is greater than KNG's maximum drawdown of -35.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFII and KNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFII | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.07% | -35.12% | -12.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.07% | -8.61% | -39.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.95% | -5.89% | -40.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.01% | -4.13% | -14.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.04% | 3.32% | +23.72% |
Volatility
DFII vs. KNG - Volatility Comparison
FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF (DFII) has a higher volatility of 9.03% compared to FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) at 2.29%. This indicates that DFII's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFII | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.03% | 2.29% | +6.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.27% | 7.39% | +25.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.33% | 10.19% | +31.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.08% | 13.59% | +27.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.08% | 17.18% | +23.90% |
DFII vs. KNG - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFII has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than KNG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFII vs. KNG - Dividend Comparison
DFII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.87%, more than KNG's 8.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFII FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF | 27.87% | 15.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KNG FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF | 8.67% | 8.61% | 9.08% | 5.91% | 4.00% | 3.45% | 3.62% | 4.09% | 3.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFII and KNG have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFII has higher volatility (9.03%) compared to KNG (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFII dropped -48.07% vs KNG's -35.12%.
On 1-year performance, KNG leads with 7.44% vs -37.26% for DFII. On fees, KNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, KNG has been the lower-risk option at 2.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, KNG has performed better with a 7.44% return vs -37.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DFII.
DFII has the higher dividend yield at 27.87%, compared with 8.67% for KNG.
DFII is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while KNG is Dividend. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DFII and 0.75% for KNG.
KNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.73 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFII and KNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer