PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFII vs. KNG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFII vs. KNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF (DFII) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFII achieves a -24.78% return, which is significantly lower than KNG's 2.20% return.


DFII

1D
-2.65%
1M
-17.17%
YTD
-24.78%
6M
-28.08%
1Y
-37.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

KNG

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.89%
YTD
2.20%
6M
2.33%
1Y
7.44%
3Y*
7.06%
5Y*
4.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFII vs. KNG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DFII and KNG is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFII vs. KNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFII
DFII Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
DFII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFII Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFII Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
DFII Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFII Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

KNG
KNG Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
KNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNG Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
KNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNG Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFII vs. KNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF (DFII) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFIIKNGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

1.13

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.78

0.87

-1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.38

2.25

-3.63

DFII vs. KNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFII Sharpe Ratio is -0.91, which is lower than the KNG Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFII and KNG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFIIKNGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.91

0.73

-1.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.44

0.49

-0.93

Drawdowns

DFII vs. KNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFII drawdown since its inception was -48.07%, which is greater than KNG's maximum drawdown of -35.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFII and KNG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFIIKNGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.07%

-35.12%

-12.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.07%

-8.61%

-39.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.95%

-5.89%

-40.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.01%

-4.13%

-14.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.04%

3.32%

+23.72%

Volatility

DFII vs. KNG - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF (DFII) has a higher volatility of 9.03% compared to FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) at 2.29%. This indicates that DFII's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFIIKNGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.03%

2.29%

+6.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.27%

7.39%

+25.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.33%

10.19%

+31.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.08%

13.59%

+27.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.08%

17.18%

+23.90%

DFII vs. KNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFII has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than KNG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFII vs. KNG - Dividend Comparison

DFII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.87%, more than KNG's 8.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DFII
FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF
27.87%15.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KNG
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
8.67%8.61%9.08%5.91%4.00%3.45%3.62%4.09%3.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFII and KNG have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFII has higher volatility (9.03%) compared to KNG (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFII dropped -48.07% vs KNG's -35.12%.

On 1-year performance, KNG leads with 7.44% vs -37.26% for DFII. On fees, KNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, KNG has been the lower-risk option at 2.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, KNG has performed better with a 7.44% return vs -37.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DFII.

DFII has the higher dividend yield at 27.87%, compared with 8.67% for KNG.

DFII is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while KNG is Dividend. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DFII and 0.75% for KNG.

KNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.73 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFII and KNG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer