PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFII vs. BTC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFII vs. BTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF (DFII) and Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF (BTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DFII having a -22.74% return and BTC slightly lower at -23.26%.


DFII

1D
-6.02%
1M
-13.41%
YTD
-22.74%
6M
-24.59%
1Y
-34.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BTC

1D
-5.98%
1M
-14.35%
YTD
-23.26%
6M
-26.27%
1Y
-35.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFII vs. BTC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DFII and BTC is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025

1.00

The correlation between DFII and BTC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFII vs. BTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFII
DFII Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
DFII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFII Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFII Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
DFII Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFII Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

BTC
BTC Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTC Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTC Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFII vs. BTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF (DFII) and Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF (BTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFIIBTCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.84

-0.82

-0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.10

-1.09

-0.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

0.88

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.72

-0.73

+0.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.29

-1.27

-0.02

DFII vs. BTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFII Sharpe Ratio is -0.84, which is comparable to the BTC Sharpe Ratio of -0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFII and BTC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFIIBTCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.84

-0.82

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.39

0.03

-0.42

Drawdowns

DFII vs. BTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFII drawdown since its inception was -48.07%, roughly equal to the maximum BTC drawdown of -49.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFII and BTC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFIIBTCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.07%

-49.34%

+1.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.07%

-49.34%

+1.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-44.48%

-46.52%

+2.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.91%

-16.54%

-2.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.89%

28.22%

-1.33%

Volatility

DFII vs. BTC - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF (DFII) and Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust ETF (BTC) have volatilities of 9.20% and 9.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFIIBTCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.20%

9.68%

-0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.63%

34.83%

-1.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.26%

43.61%

-2.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.08%

48.31%

-7.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.08%

48.31%

-7.23%

DFII vs. BTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFII has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than BTC's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFII vs. BTC - Dividend Comparison

DFII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.13%, while BTC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, DFII and BTC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BTC has higher volatility (9.68%) compared to DFII (9.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFII dropped -48.07% vs BTC's -49.34%.

On 1-year performance, DFII leads with -34.54% vs -35.77% for BTC. On fees, BTC is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, DFII has been the lower-risk option at 9.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DFII has performed better with a -34.54% return vs -35.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BTC is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DFII.

DFII has the higher dividend yield at 27.13%, compared with 0.00% for BTC.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DFII and 0.15% for BTC.

BTC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.82 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFII and BTC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer