DFII vs. CBOO

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DFII (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF) and CBOO (Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - DFII is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by First Trust, while CBOO is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos. Both are actively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFII charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CBOO.

Performance

DFII vs. CBOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF (DFII) and Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFII achieves a -28.19% return, which is significantly lower than CBOO's 0.10% return.

DFII

• 1D: -2.94%
• 1M: -17.11%
• YTD: -28.19%
• 6M: -28.07%
• 1Y: -38.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CBOO

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.16%
• YTD: 0.10%
• 6M: 0.02%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFII vs. CBOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DFII FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF	-28.19%	-28.14%
CBOO Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October	0.10%	-1.66%

Correlation

The correlation between DFII and CBOO is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2025	0.72

Return for Risk

DFII vs. CBOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFII

DFII Risk / Return Rank: 2
DFII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
DFII Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
DFII Omega Ratio Rank: 2
DFII Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
DFII Martin Ratio Rank: 2

CBOO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFII vs. CBOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF (DFII) and Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DFII	CBOO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.93	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.29	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.85	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.78	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.34	—	—

Drawdowns

DFII vs. CBOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFII drawdown since its inception was -50.13%, which is greater than CBOO's maximum drawdown of -2.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFII and CBOO.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFII	CBOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.13%	-2.34%	-47.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-50.13%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.40%	-1.58%	-46.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.16%	-1.60%	-18.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	29.13%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DFII	CBOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.48%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.37%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.94%	2.07%	+39.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	41.20%	2.07%	+39.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.20%	2.07%	+39.13%

DFII vs. CBOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFII has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than CBOO's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFII vs. CBOO - Dividend Comparison

DFII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 29.19%, more than CBOO's 0.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
CBOO Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October	0.57%	0.57%
DFII FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF	29.19%	15.51%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFII and CBOO in my portfolio?

DFII and CBOO have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DFII or CBOO?

On fees, CBOO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DFII or CBOO?

CBOO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DFII.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DFII or CBOO?

DFII has the higher dividend yield at 29.19%, compared with 0.57% for CBOO.

What is the main difference between DFII and CBOO?

DFII is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CBOO is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DFII and 0.69% for CBOO.