DFIC vs. EFAV
DFIC (DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF) and EFAV (iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. DFIC is actively managed, while EFAV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFIC returned 19.43%/yr vs 12.87%/yr for EFAV. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DFIC charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for EFAV.
Performance
DFIC vs. EFAV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFIC achieves a 10.29% return, which is significantly higher than EFAV's 3.83% return.
DFIC
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- 2.87%
- YTD
- 10.29%
- 6M
- 13.30%
- 1Y
- 27.29%
- 3Y*
- 19.43%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EFAV
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- -1.10%
- YTD
- 3.83%
- 6M
- 5.18%
- 1Y
- 9.41%
- 3Y*
- 12.87%
- 5Y*
- 6.17%
- 10Y*
- 5.93%
DFIC vs. EFAV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFIC DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF | 10.29% | 37.09% | 4.10% | 17.32% | -9.27% |
EFAV iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF | 3.83% | 26.00% | 5.30% | 12.52% | -9.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFIC and EFAV is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2022 | 0.87 |
The correlation between DFIC and EFAV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
DFIC vs. EFAV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFIC
EFAV
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
DFIC
EFAV
Industrials
DFIC
EFAV
Basic Materials
DFIC
EFAV
Consumer Cyclical
DFIC
EFAV
Energy
DFIC
EFAV
Technology
DFIC
EFAV
Healthcare
DFIC
EFAV
Consumer Defensive
DFIC
EFAV
Communication Services
DFIC
EFAV
Utilities
DFIC
EFAV
Real Estate
DFIC
EFAV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFIC vs. EFAV — Risk / Return Rank
DFIC
EFAV
DFIC vs. EFAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF (DFIC) and iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFIC | EFAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.17 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 1.46 | +1.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.90 | 4.10 | +5.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFIC | EFAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 0.92 | +1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 0.53 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
DFIC vs. EFAV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFIC drawdown since its inception was -24.40%, smaller than the maximum EFAV drawdown of -27.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFIC and EFAV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFIC | EFAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.40% | -27.56% | +3.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.00% | -6.46% | -4.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.14% | -8.75% | -4.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.32% | -5.61% | +4.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.55% | -4.77% | +0.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.76% | 2.30% | +0.46% |
Volatility
DFIC vs. EFAV - Volatility Comparison
DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF (DFIC) has a higher volatility of 4.34% compared to iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV) at 3.17%. This indicates that DFIC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFAV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFIC | EFAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.34% | 3.17% | +1.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.50% | 8.17% | +3.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.85% | 10.35% | +3.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.21% | 11.79% | +4.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.21% | 13.21% | +3.00% |
DFIC vs. EFAV - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFIC has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than EFAV's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DFIC vs. EFAV - Dividend Comparison
DFIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, less than EFAV's 3.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFIC DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF | 2.27% | 2.54% | 2.87% | 2.55% | 1.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EFAV iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF | 3.08% | 3.20% | 3.24% | 3.08% | 2.53% | 2.47% | 1.33% | 4.19% | 3.34% | 2.45% | 3.94% | 2.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFIC and EFAV have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFIC has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to EFAV (3.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFIC dropped -24.40% vs EFAV's -27.56%.
On 3-year performance, DFIC leads with 19.43% vs 12.87% for EFAV. On fees, EFAV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, EFAV has been the lower-risk option at 3.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DFIC has performed better with a 19.43% return vs 12.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EFAV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for DFIC.
EFAV has the higher dividend yield at 3.08%, compared with 2.27% for DFIC.
They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for DFIC and 0.20% for EFAV.
DFIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFIC and EFAV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer