PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFIC vs. EFAV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFIC vs. EFAV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF (DFIC) and iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFIC achieves a 10.29% return, which is significantly higher than EFAV's 3.83% return.


DFIC

1D
-0.71%
1M
2.87%
YTD
10.29%
6M
13.30%
1Y
27.29%
3Y*
19.43%
5Y*
10Y*

EFAV

1D
-0.68%
1M
-1.10%
YTD
3.83%
6M
5.18%
1Y
9.41%
3Y*
12.87%
5Y*
6.17%
10Y*
5.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFIC vs. EFAV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DFIC
DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF
10.29%37.09%4.10%17.32%-9.27%
EFAV
iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF
3.83%26.00%5.30%12.52%-9.49%

Correlation

The correlation between DFIC and EFAV is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2022

0.87

The correlation between DFIC and EFAV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFIC vs. EFAV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFIC
EFAV

Financial Services

20.6%
19.9%

Industrials

20.2%
15.1%

Basic Materials

11.0%
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
5.2%

Energy

8.1%
8.2%

Technology

7.8%
4.5%

Healthcare

7.0%
12.4%

Consumer Defensive

6.1%
11.5%

Communication Services

4.3%
9.7%

Utilities

3.7%
9.1%

Real Estate

1.8%
2.9%

Financial Services

DFIC
20.6%
EFAV
19.9%

Industrials

DFIC
20.2%
EFAV
15.1%

Basic Materials

DFIC
11.0%
EFAV
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

DFIC
9.5%
EFAV
5.2%

Energy

DFIC
8.1%
EFAV
8.2%

Technology

DFIC
7.8%
EFAV
4.5%

Healthcare

DFIC
7.0%
EFAV
12.4%

Consumer Defensive

DFIC
6.1%
EFAV
11.5%

Communication Services

DFIC
4.3%
EFAV
9.7%

Utilities

DFIC
3.7%
EFAV
9.1%

Real Estate

DFIC
1.8%
EFAV
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFIC vs. EFAV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFIC
DFIC Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
DFIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFIC Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
DFIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFIC Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

EFAV
EFAV Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
EFAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAV Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAV Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFIC vs. EFAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF (DFIC) and iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFICEFAVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.17

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

1.46

+1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.90

4.10

+5.80

DFIC vs. EFAV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFIC Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is higher than the EFAV Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFIC and EFAV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFICEFAVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

0.92

+1.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.53

+0.28

Drawdowns

DFIC vs. EFAV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFIC drawdown since its inception was -24.40%, smaller than the maximum EFAV drawdown of -27.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFIC and EFAV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFICEFAVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.40%

-27.56%

+3.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.00%

-6.46%

-4.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.14%

-8.75%

-4.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.32%

-5.61%

+4.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.55%

-4.77%

+0.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.76%

2.30%

+0.46%

Volatility

DFIC vs. EFAV - Volatility Comparison

DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF (DFIC) has a higher volatility of 4.34% compared to iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF (EFAV) at 3.17%. This indicates that DFIC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFAV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFICEFAVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.34%

3.17%

+1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.50%

8.17%

+3.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.85%

10.35%

+3.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.21%

11.79%

+4.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.21%

13.21%

+3.00%

DFIC vs. EFAV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFIC has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than EFAV's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFIC vs. EFAV - Dividend Comparison

DFIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, less than EFAV's 3.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFIC
DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF
2.27%2.54%2.87%2.55%1.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EFAV
iShares Edge MSCI Min Vol EAFE ETF
3.08%3.20%3.24%3.08%2.53%2.47%1.33%4.19%3.34%2.45%3.94%2.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFIC and EFAV have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFIC has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to EFAV (3.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFIC dropped -24.40% vs EFAV's -27.56%.

On 3-year performance, DFIC leads with 19.43% vs 12.87% for EFAV. On fees, EFAV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, EFAV has been the lower-risk option at 3.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DFIC has performed better with a 19.43% return vs 12.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EFAV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for DFIC.

EFAV has the higher dividend yield at 3.08%, compared with 2.27% for DFIC.

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for DFIC and 0.20% for EFAV.

DFIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFIC and EFAV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer