DFAU vs. PSCX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DFAU (Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF) and PSCX (Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DFAU returned 13.05%/yr vs 8.46%/yr for PSCX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DFAU charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PSCX.

Performance

DFAU vs. PSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFAU achieves a 11.32% return, which is significantly higher than PSCX's 5.11% return.

DFAU

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: 4.93%
• YTD: 11.32%
• 6M: 11.27%
• 1Y: 28.49%
• 3Y*: 21.70%
• 5Y*: 13.05%
• 10Y*: —

PSCX

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 2.00%
• YTD: 5.11%
• 6M: 5.98%
• 1Y: 15.49%
• 3Y*: 12.85%
• 5Y*: 8.46%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFAU vs. PSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DFAU Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF	11.32%	16.78%	23.17%	24.79%	-16.99%	26.89%	1.15%
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF	5.11%	12.08%	13.27%	16.57%	-7.35%	9.03%	0.81%

Correlation

The correlation between DFAU and PSCX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2020	0.90

The correlation between DFAU and PSCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFAU vs. PSCX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DFAU	PSCX
Technology	32.7%	33.2%
Financial Services	12.8%	12.5%
Consumer Cyclical	10.8%	10.0%
Industrials	10.4%	8.4%
Communication Services	10.4%	10.3%
Healthcare	8.5%	9.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.8%	5.4%
Energy	4.6%	4.2%
Utilities	2.5%	2.6%
Basic Materials	2.4%	1.9%
Real Estate	0.2%	2.0%

Return for Risk

DFAU vs. PSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFAU

DFAU Risk / Return Rank: 71
DFAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
DFAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
DFAU Omega Ratio Rank: 70
DFAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
DFAU Martin Ratio Rank: 77

PSCX

PSCX Risk / Return Rank: 85
PSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
PSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
PSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
PSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
PSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFAU vs. PSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) and Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DFAU	PSCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.38	2.82	-0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.24	4.22	-0.98
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.58	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.30	3.70	-0.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.10	18.94	-3.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DFAU vs. PSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFAU Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the PSCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFAU and PSCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DFAU	PSCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.38	2.82	-0.44
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77	1.20	-0.43
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.94	1.27	-0.33

Drawdowns

DFAU vs. PSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFAU drawdown since its inception was -23.61%, which is greater than PSCX's maximum drawdown of -10.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAU and PSCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFAU	PSCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.61%	-10.20%	-13.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.67%	-4.20%	-4.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.36%	-9.61%	-9.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.61%	-10.20%	-13.41%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.67%	-0.12%	-0.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.99%	-1.87%	-3.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.89%	0.82%	+1.07%

Volatility

DFAU vs. PSCX - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) has a higher volatility of 2.95% compared to Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF (PSCX) at 0.89%. This indicates that DFAU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFAU	PSCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.95%	0.89%	+2.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.04%	4.21%	+4.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.06%	5.53%	+6.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.02%	7.07%	+9.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.73%	6.96%	+9.77%

DFAU vs. PSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFAU has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than PSCX's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFAU vs. PSCX - Dividend Comparison

DFAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, while PSCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
DFAU Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF	0.90%	0.95%	1.10%	1.29%	1.40%	1.00%	0.13%
PSCX Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (December) ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFAU and PSCX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, DFAU and PSCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, DFAU or PSCX?

DFAU has higher volatility (2.95%) compared to PSCX (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAU dropped -23.61% vs PSCX's -10.20%.

Which ETF is better, DFAU or PSCX?

On 5-year performance, DFAU leads with 13.05% vs 8.46% for PSCX. On fees, DFAU is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, PSCX has been the lower-risk option at 0.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DFAU or PSCX?

Over the 5-year period, DFAU has performed better with a 13.05% return vs 8.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DFAU or PSCX?

DFAU is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PSCX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DFAU or PSCX?

DFAU has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.00% for PSCX.

What is the main difference between DFAU and PSCX?

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for DFAU and 0.75% for PSCX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.