PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFAU vs. DFIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DFAU vs. DFIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) and Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DFAU vs. DFIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DFAU
Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF
-2.67%16.78%23.17%24.79%-16.99%6.51%
DFIV
Dimensional International Value ETF
7.08%45.36%7.26%17.75%-3.70%0.08%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFAU achieves a -2.67% return, which is significantly lower than DFIV's 7.08% return.


DFAU

1D
0.71%
1M
-4.35%
YTD
-2.67%
6M
-0.51%
1Y
19.02%
3Y*
17.82%
5Y*
11.15%
10Y*

DFIV

1D
1.04%
1M
-3.15%
YTD
7.08%
6M
16.33%
1Y
39.71%
3Y*
22.67%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DFAU vs. DFIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFAU has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than DFIV's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

DFAU vs. DFIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFAU
DFAU Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
DFAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAU Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAU Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

DFIV
DFIV Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
DFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
DFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFAU vs. DFIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) and Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFAUDFIVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.03

2.32

-1.29

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.56

3.02

-1.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.48

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

3.29

-1.72

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.42

14.56

-7.14

DFAU vs. DFIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFAU Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is lower than the DFIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFAU and DFIV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFAUDFIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.03

2.32

-1.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.91

-0.11

Correlation

The correlation between DFAU and DFIV is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

DFAU vs. DFIV - Dividend Comparison

DFAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than DFIV's 2.66% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
DFAU
Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF
1.03%0.95%1.10%1.29%1.40%1.00%0.13%
DFIV
Dimensional International Value ETF
2.66%2.92%3.88%3.93%3.84%2.30%0.00%

Drawdowns

DFAU vs. DFIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFAU drawdown since its inception was -23.61%, smaller than the maximum DFIV drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAU and DFIV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DFAUDFIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.61%

-25.42%

+1.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.45%

-12.12%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.36%

-4.97%

-0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.12%

-4.58%

-0.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

2.73%

-0.11%

Volatility

DFAU vs. DFIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) is 5.39%, while Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) has a volatility of 6.20%. This indicates that DFAU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DFAUDFIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.39%

6.20%

-0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.67%

10.50%

-0.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.52%

17.16%

+1.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.03%

16.70%

+0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.87%

16.70%

+0.17%