DES vs. QQQS
DES (WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund) and QQQS (Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - DES tracks the WisdomTree SmallCap Dividend (TR) while QQQS tracks the Nasdaq Innovators Completion Cap Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DES returned 14.65%/yr vs 16.56%/yr for QQQS. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DES charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for QQQS.
Performance
DES vs. QQQS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DES achieves a 16.63% return, which is significantly lower than QQQS's 29.47% return.
DES
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 16.63%
- 6M
- 17.07%
- 1Y
- 28.87%
- 3Y*
- 14.65%
- 5Y*
- 6.21%
- 10Y*
- 8.17%
QQQS
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 7.55%
- YTD
- 29.47%
- 6M
- 33.29%
- 1Y
- 88.16%
- 3Y*
- 16.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DES vs. QQQS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DES WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund | 16.63% | 0.25% | 9.93% | 16.50% | 5.73% |
QQQS Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF | 29.47% | 23.03% | 10.20% | -1.94% | 6.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between DES and QQQS is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2022 | 0.74 |
The correlation between DES and QQQS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
DES vs. QQQS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DES
QQQS
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Healthcare
Financial Services
DES
QQQS
Consumer Cyclical
DES
QQQS
Industrials
DES
QQQS
Energy
DES
QQQS
Real Estate
DES
QQQS
-
Basic Materials
DES
QQQS
Technology
DES
QQQS
Utilities
DES
QQQS
-
Consumer Defensive
DES
QQQS
Communication Services
DES
QQQS
Healthcare
DES
QQQS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DES vs. QQQS — Risk / Return Rank
DES
QQQS
DES vs. QQQS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund (DES) and Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DES | QQQS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.77 | 3.30 | -1.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.64 | 4.07 | -1.44 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.48 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.67 | 6.59 | -2.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.48 | 22.06 | -11.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DES | QQQS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.77 | 3.30 | -1.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.65 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
DES vs. QQQS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DES drawdown since its inception was -65.48%, which is greater than QQQS's maximum drawdown of -38.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DES and QQQS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DES | QQQS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.48% | -38.06% | -27.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.64% | -13.63% | +5.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.16% | -34.32% | +9.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | -0.86% | +0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.68% | -13.28% | +3.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.68% | 4.07% | -1.39% |
Volatility
DES vs. QQQS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund (DES) is 4.24%, while Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS) has a volatility of 7.11%. This indicates that DES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DES | QQQS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.24% | 7.11% | -2.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.94% | 18.58% | -7.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.42% | 26.84% | -10.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.56% | 28.34% | -8.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.97% | 28.34% | -6.37% |
DES vs. QQQS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DES has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQS's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
DES vs. QQQS - Dividend Comparison
DES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, less than QQQS's 2.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DES WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund | 2.37% | 2.85% | 2.81% | 2.65% | 2.89% | 2.31% | 2.75% | 2.68% | 3.65% | 2.89% | 2.70% | 3.09% |
QQQS Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF | 2.69% | 3.48% | 0.80% | 0.68% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DES and QQQS have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQS has higher volatility (7.11%) compared to DES (4.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DES dropped -65.48% vs QQQS's -38.06%.
On 3-year performance, QQQS leads with 16.56% vs 14.65% for DES. On fees, QQQS is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, DES has been the lower-risk option at 4.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, QQQS has performed better with a 16.56% return vs 14.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQS is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for DES.
QQQS has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 2.37% for DES.
DES tracks WisdomTree SmallCap Dividend (TR), while QQQS tracks Nasdaq Innovators Completion Cap Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for DES and 0.20% for QQQS.
QQQS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DES and QQQS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer