PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DEM vs. DBEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DEM vs. DBEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEM achieves a 19.97% return, which is significantly lower than DBEM's 33.09% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DEM having a 10.45% annualized return and DBEM not far ahead at 10.81%.


DEM

1D
-1.19%
1M
6.63%
YTD
19.97%
6M
20.75%
1Y
32.23%
3Y*
19.32%
5Y*
9.57%
10Y*
10.45%

DBEM

1D
0.81%
1M
11.14%
YTD
33.09%
6M
35.55%
1Y
65.81%
3Y*
26.11%
5Y*
10.06%
10Y*
10.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEM vs. DBEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DEM
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund
19.97%21.29%4.46%20.93%-10.43%11.49%-5.84%19.84%-7.69%26.26%
DBEM
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF
33.09%30.42%10.61%10.53%-17.00%-2.26%18.12%16.77%-10.81%27.10%

Correlation

The correlation between DEM and DBEM is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2011

0.78

The correlation between DEM and DBEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

DEM vs. DBEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DEM
DBEM

Financial Services

21.9%
19.6%

Technology

17.4%
36.4%

Industrials

9.5%
7.6%

Energy

6.1%
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

5.8%
3.0%

Consumer Cyclical

5.0%
9.6%

Basic Materials

3.5%
6.6%

Real Estate

3.0%
1.1%

Utilities

3.0%
2.1%

Communication Services

3.0%
7.0%

Healthcare

0.6%
2.9%

Financial Services

DEM
21.9%
DBEM
19.6%

Technology

DEM
17.4%
DBEM
36.4%

Industrials

DEM
9.5%
DBEM
7.6%

Energy

DEM
6.1%
DBEM
4.1%

Consumer Defensive

DEM
5.8%
DBEM
3.0%

Consumer Cyclical

DEM
5.0%
DBEM
9.6%

Basic Materials

DEM
3.5%
DBEM
6.6%

Real Estate

DEM
3.0%
DBEM
1.1%

Utilities

DEM
3.0%
DBEM
2.1%

Communication Services

DEM
3.0%
DBEM
7.0%

Healthcare

DEM
0.6%
DBEM
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DEM vs. DBEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEM
DEM Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
DEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
DEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

DBEM
DBEM Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
DBEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBEM Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
DBEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBEM Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEM vs. DBEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DEMDBEMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.38

3.69

-1.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.28

4.73

-1.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.66

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.10

6.29

-2.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.52

25.09

-10.57

DEM vs. DBEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is lower than the DBEM Sharpe Ratio of 3.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEM and DBEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DEMDBEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38

3.69

-1.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.59

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.63

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.34

-0.12

Drawdowns

DEM vs. DBEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEM drawdown since its inception was -51.85%, which is greater than DBEM's maximum drawdown of -33.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEM and DBEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DEMDBEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.85%

-33.51%

-18.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.89%

-10.51%

+2.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.64%

-15.12%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.18%

-30.48%

+3.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.79%

-33.51%

-4.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.19%

0.00%

-1.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.90%

-11.69%

-1.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

2.63%

-0.41%

Volatility

DEM vs. DBEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM) is 5.64%, while Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM) has a volatility of 7.46%. This indicates that DEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DEMDBEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.64%

7.46%

-1.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.33%

15.50%

-4.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.59%

17.94%

-4.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.33%

17.08%

-1.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.96%

17.14%

+0.82%

DEM vs. DBEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEM has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than DBEM's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

DEM vs. DBEM - Dividend Comparison

DEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, more than DBEM's 1.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBEM
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF
1.38%1.84%2.48%2.55%2.65%1.77%1.74%2.59%2.85%1.51%1.59%3.49%
DEM
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund
3.76%4.88%5.24%5.49%8.62%5.87%4.21%4.78%4.47%3.67%3.63%5.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


DEM and DBEM have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBEM has higher volatility (7.46%) compared to DEM (5.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEM dropped -51.85% vs DBEM's -33.51%.

On 10-year performance, DBEM leads with 10.81% vs 10.45% for DEM. On fees, DEM is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, DEM has been the lower-risk option at 5.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DBEM has performed better with a 10.81% return vs 10.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DEM is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for DBEM.

DEM has the higher dividend yield at 3.76%, compared with 1.38% for DBEM.

DEM tracks WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity income Index, while DBEM tracks MSCI EM US Dollar Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for DEM and 0.66% for DBEM.

DBEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.69 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DEM and DBEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer