DEM vs. FNDE
Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM) and Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF (FNDE).
DEM and FNDE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DEM is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity income Index. It was launched on Jul 13, 2007. FNDE is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013. Both DEM and FNDE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: DEM or FNDE.
Key characteristics
| DEM | FNDE | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 6.74% | 7.85% |
| 1Y Return | 18.77% | 15.06% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 4.21% | 1.56% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 6.18% | 5.52% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 3.71% | 4.18% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.51 | 1.14 |
| Daily Std Dev | 13.62% | 14.44% |
| Max Drawdown | -51.85% | -43.55% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -2.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between DEM and FNDE is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
DEM vs. FNDE - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, DEM achieves a 6.74% return, which is significantly lower than FNDE's 7.85% return. Over the past 10 years, DEM has underperformed FNDE with an annualized return of 3.71%, while FNDE has yielded a comparatively higher 4.18% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DEM vs. FNDE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DEM has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDE's 0.39% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
DEM vs. FNDE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM) and Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF (FNDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
DEM vs. FNDE - Dividend Comparison
DEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.46%, more than FNDE's 4.39% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEM WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund | 5.46% | 5.49% | 8.62% | 5.87% | 4.21% | 4.79% | 4.47% | 3.67% | 3.63% | 5.21% | 5.51% | 4.10% |
FNDE Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF | 4.39% | 4.74% | 5.59% | 4.32% | 2.50% | 3.47% | 3.04% | 2.05% | 1.65% | 2.02% | 1.36% | 0.51% |
Drawdowns
DEM vs. FNDE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DEM drawdown since its inception was -51.85%, which is greater than FNDE's maximum drawdown of -43.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEM and FNDE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
DEM vs. FNDE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM) is 4.25%, while Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index ETF (FNDE) has a volatility of 4.80%. This indicates that DEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.