PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DEM vs. FNDE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DEM vs. FNDE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM) and Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEM achieves a 17.08% return, which is significantly higher than FNDE's 15.01% return. Over the past 10 years, DEM has underperformed FNDE with an annualized return of 9.26%, while FNDE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.16% annualized return.


DEM

1D
0.19%
1M
0.60%
6M
10.28%
YTD
17.08%
1Y
24.73%
3Y*
15.88%
5Y*
10.19%
10Y*
9.26%
ALL TIME*
4.92%

FNDE

1D
0.66%
1M
4.72%
6M
6.81%
YTD
15.01%
1Y
29.41%
3Y*
19.09%
5Y*
10.74%
10Y*
10.16%
ALL TIME*
7.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$8.90M$9.48M$10.87M
$29.51M$30.86M$33.63M

DEM vs. FNDE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DEM
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund
17.08%21.29%4.46%20.93%-10.43%11.49%-5.84%19.84%-7.69%26.26%
FNDE
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF
15.01%29.46%12.10%14.99%-15.58%14.41%-2.77%19.75%-10.37%26.77%

Correlation

The correlation between DEM and FNDE is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013

0.95

The correlation between DEM and FNDE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

DEM vs. FNDE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DEM
FNDE

Financial Services

21.9%
25.0%

Technology

17.5%
22.3%

Industrials

8.9%
4.6%

Energy

6.2%
13.2%

Consumer Defensive

5.8%
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

5.4%
8.9%

Basic Materials

3.7%
12.0%

Utilities

3.0%
2.4%

Communication Services

3.0%
6.6%

Real Estate

2.9%
1.4%

Healthcare

0.6%
0.4%

Financial Services

DEM
21.9%
FNDE
25.0%

Technology

DEM
17.5%
FNDE
22.3%

Industrials

DEM
8.9%
FNDE
4.6%

Energy

DEM
6.2%
FNDE
13.2%

Consumer Defensive

DEM
5.8%
FNDE
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

DEM
5.4%
FNDE
8.9%

Basic Materials

DEM
3.7%
FNDE
12.0%

Utilities

DEM
3.0%
FNDE
2.4%

Communication Services

DEM
3.0%
FNDE
6.6%

Real Estate

DEM
2.9%
FNDE
1.4%

Healthcare

DEM
0.6%
FNDE
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DEM vs. FNDE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DEM
DEM Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
DEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
DEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

FNDE
FNDE Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FNDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDE Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDE Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DEM vs. FNDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM) and Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DEMFNDEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.32

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

2.82

+0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.50

8.93

+0.57

DEM vs. FNDE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the FNDE Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEM and FNDE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DEM vs. FNDE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEM drawdown since its inception was -51.85%, which is greater than FNDE's maximum drawdown of -43.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEM and FNDE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DEMFNDEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.85%

-43.55%

-8.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.89%

-10.23%

+2.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.64%

-18.40%

+2.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.18%

-29.44%

+2.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.79%

-39.93%

+2.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.57%

-2.07%

-1.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.82%

-11.62%

-1.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

3.22%

-0.61%

Volatility

DEM vs. FNDE - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM) has a higher volatility of 5.12% compared to Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF (FNDE) at 4.42%. This indicates that DEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DEMFNDEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.12%

4.42%

+0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.28%

13.64%

-0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.02%

16.16%

-1.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.60%

17.08%

-1.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.85%

19.13%

-1.28%

DEM vs. FNDE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEM has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDE's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

DEM vs. FNDE - Dividend Comparison

DEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, more than FNDE's 3.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DEM
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund
4.18%4.88%5.24%5.49%8.62%5.87%4.21%4.78%4.47%3.67%3.63%5.21%
FNDE
Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Equity ETF
3.60%4.19%4.82%4.74%5.59%4.32%2.50%3.47%2.98%2.05%1.65%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, DEM and FNDE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DEM has higher volatility (5.12%) compared to FNDE (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEM dropped -51.85% vs FNDE's -43.55%.

On 10-year performance, FNDE leads with 10.16% vs 9.26% for DEM. On fees, FNDE is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, FNDE has been the lower-risk option at 4.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FNDE has performed better with a 10.16% return vs 9.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FNDE is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for DEM.

DEM has the higher dividend yield at 4.18%, compared with 3.60% for FNDE.

DEM is categorized as Dividend, while FNDE is Emerging Markets Equities. DEM tracks WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Index, while FNDE tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Emerging Markets Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for DEM and 0.39% for FNDE.

FNDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DEM and FNDE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer