DEM vs. BKEM
DEM (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund) and BKEM (BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - DEM tracks the WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Index while BKEM tracks the Morningstar Emerging Markets Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DEM returned 9.77%/yr vs 6.39%/yr for BKEM. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DEM charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for BKEM.
Performance
DEM vs. BKEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DEM achieves a 16.70% return, which is significantly lower than BKEM's 20.10% return.
DEM
- 1D
- -1.82%
- 1M
- -2.61%
- 6M
- 13.85%
- YTD
- 16.70%
- 1Y
- 22.03%
- 3Y*
- 16.63%
- 5Y*
- 9.77%
- 10Y*
- 9.22%
BKEM
- 1D
- -3.63%
- 1M
- -4.84%
- 6M
- 13.52%
- YTD
- 20.10%
- 1Y
- 36.79%
- 3Y*
- 18.94%
- 5Y*
- 6.39%
- 10Y*
- —
DEM vs. BKEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEM WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund | 16.70% | 21.29% | 4.46% | 20.93% | -10.43% | 11.49% | 28.96% |
BKEM BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 20.10% | 30.55% | 7.53% | 8.68% | -19.43% | -3.91% | 48.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between DEM and BKEM is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2020 | 0.84 |
The correlation between DEM and BKEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
DEM vs. BKEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DEM
BKEM
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Healthcare
Financial Services
DEM
BKEM
Technology
DEM
BKEM
Industrials
DEM
BKEM
Energy
DEM
BKEM
Consumer Defensive
DEM
BKEM
Consumer Cyclical
DEM
BKEM
Basic Materials
DEM
BKEM
Utilities
DEM
BKEM
Communication Services
DEM
BKEM
Real Estate
DEM
BKEM
Healthcare
DEM
BKEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DEM vs. BKEM — Risk / Return Rank
DEM
BKEM
DEM vs. BKEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM) and BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DEM | BKEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.30 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.80 | 2.82 | -0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.03 | 9.64 | -0.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DEM vs. BKEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DEM drawdown since its inception was -51.85%, which is greater than BKEM's maximum drawdown of -39.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEM and BKEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DEM | BKEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.85% | -39.48% | -12.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.89% | -13.11% | +5.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.64% | -18.38% | +2.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.18% | -34.52% | +7.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.87% | -9.06% | +5.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.84% | -15.81% | +2.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.45% | 3.83% | -1.38% |
Volatility
DEM vs. BKEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM) is 5.76%, while BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) has a volatility of 10.87%. This indicates that DEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DEM | BKEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.76% | 10.87% | -5.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.00% | 20.93% | -7.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.73% | 22.92% | -8.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.57% | 19.50% | -3.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.84% | 19.65% | -1.81% |
DEM vs. BKEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
DEM has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than BKEM's 0.11% expense ratio.
Dividends
DEM vs. BKEM - Dividend Comparison
DEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, more than BKEM's 1.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKEM BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 1.95% | 2.25% | 2.76% | 3.02% | 3.15% | 2.22% | 1.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DEM WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund | 4.19% | 4.88% | 5.24% | 5.49% | 8.62% | 5.87% | 4.21% | 4.78% | 4.47% | 3.67% | 3.63% | 5.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DEM and BKEM have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BKEM has higher volatility (10.87%) compared to DEM (5.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEM dropped -51.85% vs BKEM's -39.48%.
On 5-year performance, DEM leads with 9.77% vs 6.39% for BKEM. On fees, BKEM is cheaper at 0.11% per year. On volatility, DEM has been the lower-risk option at 5.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DEM has performed better with a 9.77% return vs 6.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BKEM is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for DEM.
DEM has the higher dividend yield at 4.19%, compared with 1.95% for BKEM.
DEM tracks WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Index, while BKEM tracks Morningstar Emerging Markets Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.63% for DEM and 0.11% for BKEM.
BKEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DEM and BKEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer