DEFT vs. CLS

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

DEFT (DeFi Technologies Inc) and CLS (Celestica Inc.) are both stocks. DEFT operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services), while CLS operates in Electronic Components (Technology). Over the past year, DEFT returned -83.33% vs 305.01% for CLS. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

DEFT vs. CLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DeFi Technologies Inc (DEFT) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEFT achieves a -24.01% return, which is significantly lower than CLS's 59.81% return.

DEFT

• 1D: -7.81%
• 1M: -26.69%
• YTD: -24.01%
• 6M: -57.21%
• 1Y: -83.33%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CLS

• 1D: 10.75%
• 1M: 12.76%
• YTD: 59.81%
• 6M: 55.25%
• 1Y: 305.01%
• 3Y*: 230.21%
• 5Y*: 123.77%
• 10Y*: 45.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEFT vs. CLS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DEFT DeFi Technologies Inc	-24.01%	-81.60%
CLS Celestica Inc.	59.81%	194.67%

Correlation

The correlation between DEFT and CLS is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2025	0.17

Fundamentals

Market Cap DEFT : $216.48M CLS : $54.66B
EPS DEFT : $0.17 CLS : $8.28
PE Ratio DEFT : 3.41 CLS : 57.02
PEG Ratio DEFT : 0.01 CLS : 0.76
PS Ratio DEFT : 2.06 CLS : 3.96
PB Ratio DEFT : 1.48 CLS : 26.05
Total Revenue (TTM) DEFT : $103.29M CLS : $13.81B
Gross Profit (TTM) DEFT : $69.76M CLS : $1.60B
EBITDA (TTM) DEFT : $83.15M CLS : $1.32B

Return for Risk

DEFT vs. CLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEFT

DEFT Risk / Return Rank: 5
DEFT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
DEFT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
DEFT Omega Ratio Rank: 5
DEFT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
DEFT Martin Ratio Rank: 7

CLS

CLS Risk / Return Rank: 95
CLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
CLS Omega Ratio Rank: 92
CLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CLS Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEFT vs. CLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DeFi Technologies Inc (DEFT) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DEFT	CLS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.84	4.35	-5.19
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.85	3.57	-5.42
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.80	1.48	-0.68
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.97	10.58	-11.56
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.40	26.76	-28.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DEFT vs. CLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEFT Sharpe Ratio is -0.84, which is lower than the CLS Sharpe Ratio of 4.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEFT and CLS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DEFT	CLS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.84	4.35	-5.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	2.18	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.93	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.86	0.29	-1.15

Drawdowns

DEFT vs. CLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEFT drawdown since its inception was -88.69%, smaller than the maximum CLS drawdown of -96.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEFT and CLS.

Drawdown Indicators

	DEFT	CLS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.69%	-96.93%	+8.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-86.18%	-29.24%	-56.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-53.96%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-53.96%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-80.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-86.51%	0.00%	-86.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-59.90%	-73.39%	+13.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	60.04%	11.56%	+48.48%

Volatility

DEFT vs. CLS - Volatility Comparison

DeFi Technologies Inc (DEFT) has a higher volatility of 25.24% compared to Celestica Inc. (CLS) at 21.94%. This indicates that DEFT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DEFT	CLS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.24%	21.94%	+3.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	75.65%	53.58%	+22.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	99.26%	70.67%	+28.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	98.49%	57.19%	+41.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	98.49%	49.69%	+48.80%

Dividends

DEFT vs. CLS - Dividend Comparison

Neither DEFT nor CLS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DEFT and CLS in my portfolio?

DEFT and CLS have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DEFT or CLS?

DEFT has higher volatility (25.24%) compared to CLS (21.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEFT dropped -88.69% vs CLS's -96.93%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.35 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.