DEEP vs. USVM
DEEP (Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF) and USVM (VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DEEP is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the DEEP-US - Acquirers Deep Value Index, while USVM is a Momentum fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DEEP returned 3.74%/yr vs 9.74%/yr for USVM. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DEEP charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for USVM.
Performance
DEEP vs. USVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DEEP achieves a 12.39% return, which is significantly lower than USVM's 15.26% return.
DEEP
- 1D
- -2.02%
- 1M
- 0.72%
- YTD
- 12.39%
- 6M
- 11.91%
- 1Y
- 27.76%
- 3Y*
- 9.78%
- 5Y*
- 3.74%
- 10Y*
- 8.15%
USVM
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 2.60%
- YTD
- 15.26%
- 6M
- 15.00%
- 1Y
- 30.42%
- 3Y*
- 19.79%
- 5Y*
- 9.74%
- 10Y*
- —
DEEP vs. USVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEEP Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF | 12.39% | 5.69% | -2.97% | 22.37% | -17.71% | 35.66% | -9.96% | 12.54% | -7.17% | 13.60% |
USVM VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF | 15.26% | 10.56% | 16.59% | 18.90% | -13.23% | 24.44% | 11.56% | 21.65% | -9.39% | 2.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between DEEP and USVM is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017 | 0.85 |
The correlation between DEEP and USVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
DEEP vs. USVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DEEP
USVM
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
Utilities
-
Industrials
DEEP
USVM
Consumer Cyclical
DEEP
USVM
Consumer Defensive
DEEP
USVM
Financial Services
DEEP
USVM
Technology
DEEP
USVM
Healthcare
DEEP
USVM
Energy
DEEP
USVM
Basic Materials
DEEP
USVM
Communication Services
DEEP
USVM
Real Estate
DEEP
USVM
Utilities
DEEP
-
USVM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DEEP vs. USVM — Risk / Return Rank
DEEP
USVM
DEEP vs. USVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) and VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DEEP | USVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.36 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.35 | 3.66 | -1.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.76 | 13.76 | -7.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DEEP | USVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.46 | 2.05 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.50 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.49 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
DEEP vs. USVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DEEP drawdown since its inception was -52.52%, which is greater than USVM's maximum drawdown of -42.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEEP and USVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DEEP | USVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.52% | -42.38% | -10.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.87% | -8.36% | -3.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.40% | -24.34% | -4.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.40% | -25.27% | -3.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.02% | -0.57% | -1.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.40% | -7.90% | -2.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.12% | 2.22% | +1.90% |
Volatility
DEEP vs. USVM - Volatility Comparison
Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) has a higher volatility of 5.67% compared to VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) at 4.50%. This indicates that DEEP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DEEP | USVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.67% | 4.50% | +1.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.29% | 10.73% | +1.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.18% | 14.93% | +4.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.65% | 19.65% | +2.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.27% | 22.01% | +2.26% |
DEEP vs. USVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
DEEP has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than USVM's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
DEEP vs. USVM - Dividend Comparison
DEEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than USVM's 1.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEEP Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF | 1.52% | 1.78% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.28% | 1.43% | 4.03% | 3.49% | 1.51% | 2.01% | 3.14% | 3.98% |
USVM VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF | 1.76% | 1.84% | 1.75% | 1.63% | 1.43% | 0.70% | 1.21% | 1.77% | 1.43% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DEEP and USVM have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DEEP has higher volatility (5.67%) compared to USVM (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEEP dropped -52.52% vs USVM's -42.38%.
On 5-year performance, USVM leads with 9.74% vs 3.74% for DEEP. On fees, USVM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, USVM has been the lower-risk option at 4.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, USVM has performed better with a 9.74% return vs 3.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USVM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for DEEP.
USVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 1.52% for DEEP.
DEEP is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while USVM is Momentum. DEEP tracks DEEP-US - Acquirers Deep Value Index, while USVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for DEEP and 0.29% for USVM.
USVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DEEP and USVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer