DEEP vs. CALF
DEEP (Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF) and CALF (Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DEEP is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the DEEP-US - Acquirers Deep Value Index, while CALF is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DEEP returned 5.40%/yr vs 3.73%/yr for CALF. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DEEP charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for CALF.
Performance
DEEP vs. CALF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DEEP achieves a 17.11% return, which is significantly higher than CALF's 10.59% return.
DEEP
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 5.39%
- YTD
- 17.11%
- 6M
- 16.47%
- 1Y
- 30.39%
- 3Y*
- 11.36%
- 5Y*
- 5.40%
- 10Y*
- 8.67%
CALF
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- YTD
- 10.59%
- 6M
- 8.95%
- 1Y
- 25.83%
- 3Y*
- 9.33%
- 5Y*
- 3.73%
- 10Y*
- —
DEEP vs. CALF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEEP Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF | 17.11% | 5.69% | -2.97% | 22.37% | -17.71% | 35.66% | -9.96% | 12.54% | -7.17% | 19.48% |
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF | 10.59% | 2.33% | -7.41% | 35.43% | -15.20% | 40.68% | 16.55% | 18.18% | -10.06% | 5.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between DEEP and CALF is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2017 | 0.86 |
The correlation between DEEP and CALF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
DEEP vs. CALF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DEEP
CALF
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
DEEP
CALF
Industrials
DEEP
CALF
Consumer Defensive
DEEP
CALF
Financial Services
DEEP
CALF
Technology
DEEP
CALF
Healthcare
DEEP
CALF
Energy
DEEP
CALF
Basic Materials
DEEP
CALF
Communication Services
DEEP
CALF
Real Estate
DEEP
CALF
Utilities
DEEP
-
CALF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DEEP vs. CALF — Risk / Return Rank
DEEP
CALF
DEEP vs. CALF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DEEP | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.29 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.57 | 4.22 | -1.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.39 | 11.59 | -4.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DEEP vs. CALF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DEEP drawdown since its inception was -52.52%, which is greater than CALF's maximum drawdown of -47.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEEP and CALF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DEEP | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.52% | -47.58% | -4.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.87% | -6.15% | -5.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.40% | -34.22% | +5.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.40% | -34.22% | +5.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.97% | -4.33% | +3.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.36% | -10.69% | +0.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.12% | 2.23% | +1.89% |
Volatility
DEEP vs. CALF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) is 4.93%, while Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF) has a volatility of 5.39%. This indicates that DEEP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CALF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DEEP | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.93% | 5.39% | -0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.29% | 10.92% | +1.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.32% | 16.05% | +3.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.63% | 23.39% | -1.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.27% | 25.97% | -1.70% |
DEEP vs. CALF - Expense Ratio Comparison
DEEP has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than CALF's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
DEEP vs. CALF - Dividend Comparison
DEEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, more than CALF's 1.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF | 1.24% | 1.43% | 1.07% | 1.18% | 0.85% | 2.63% | 0.82% | 0.99% | 1.39% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DEEP Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF | 1.46% | 1.78% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.28% | 1.43% | 4.03% | 3.49% | 1.51% | 2.01% | 3.14% | 3.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DEEP and CALF have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CALF has higher volatility (5.39%) compared to DEEP (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEEP dropped -52.52% vs CALF's -47.58%.
On 5-year performance, DEEP leads with 5.40% vs 3.73% for CALF. On fees, CALF is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, DEEP has been the lower-risk option at 4.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DEEP has performed better with a 5.40% return vs 3.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CALF is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for DEEP.
DEEP has the higher dividend yield at 1.46%, compared with 1.24% for CALF.
DEEP is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while CALF is Small Cap Blend Equities. DEEP tracks DEEP-US - Acquirers Deep Value Index, while CALF tracks Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for DEEP and 0.59% for CALF.
CALF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DEEP and CALF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer