DEEP vs. FNGS
Compare and contrast key facts about Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS).
DEEP and FNGS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DEEP is a passively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts that tracks the performance of the DEEP-US - Acquirers Deep Value Index. It was launched on Sep 23, 2014. FNGS is a passively managed fund by BMO Financial Group that tracks the performance of the NYSE FANG+ Index. It was launched on Nov 12, 2019. Both DEEP and FNGS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: DEEP or FNGS.
Correlation
The correlation between DEEP and FNGS is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
DEEP vs. FNGS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
DEEP:
-0.14
FNGS:
2.28
DEEP:
-0.06
FNGS:
2.83
DEEP:
0.99
FNGS:
1.38
DEEP:
-0.24
FNGS:
3.28
DEEP:
-0.46
FNGS:
10.61
DEEP:
5.87%
FNGS:
5.50%
DEEP:
19.74%
FNGS:
25.61%
DEEP:
-51.92%
FNGS:
-48.98%
DEEP:
-8.58%
FNGS:
-1.02%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DEEP achieves a -2.98% return, which is significantly lower than FNGS's 58.93% return.
DEEP
-2.98%
-5.60%
3.53%
-2.71%
3.53%
6.09%
FNGS
58.93%
11.69%
24.08%
58.38%
34.03%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DEEP vs. FNGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DEEP has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FNGS's 0.58% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
DEEP vs. FNGS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
DEEP vs. FNGS - Dividend Comparison
DEEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, while FNGS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEEP Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF | 1.59% | 1.67% | 1.28% | 1.43% | 4.03% | 3.49% | 2.78% | 2.01% | 3.14% | 3.98% | 0.42% |
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
DEEP vs. FNGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DEEP drawdown since its inception was -51.92%, which is greater than FNGS's maximum drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEEP and FNGS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
DEEP vs. FNGS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Roundhill Acquirers Deep Value ETF (DEEP) is 5.67%, while MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) has a volatility of 7.99%. This indicates that DEEP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.