PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DEEF vs. XRLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DEEF vs. XRLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF (DEEF) and Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF (XRLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DEEF vs. XRLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DEEF
Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF
5.41%32.36%2.77%16.99%-16.94%9.22%7.90%19.30%-14.50%29.23%
XRLV
Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF
6.34%4.11%14.11%0.06%-4.77%27.39%2.56%29.80%-3.28%23.51%

Returns By Period


DEEF

1D
2.85%
1M
-7.64%
YTD
5.41%
6M
10.87%
1Y
30.51%
3Y*
16.25%
5Y*
7.77%
10Y*
7.98%

XRLV

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DEEF vs. XRLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEEF has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than XRLV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

DEEF vs. XRLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEEF
DEEF Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
DEEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEEF Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
DEEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEEF Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

XRLV
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEEF vs. XRLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF (DEEF) and Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF (XRLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DEEFXRLVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.70

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.11

DEEF vs. XRLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DEEFXRLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

Correlation

The correlation between DEEF and XRLV is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

DEEF vs. XRLV - Dividend Comparison

DEEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%, more than XRLV's 1.86% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DEEF
Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF
3.53%3.63%4.04%3.96%3.31%3.84%2.71%3.74%2.80%2.61%4.35%0.00%
XRLV
Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF
1.86%2.15%1.94%2.57%1.96%1.26%1.65%1.66%1.76%1.39%1.71%1.07%

Drawdowns

DEEF vs. XRLV - Drawdown Comparison


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DEEFXRLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

Volatility

DEEF vs. XRLV - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DEEFXRLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.24%