PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DEEF vs. XRLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DEEF vs. XRLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF (DEEF) and Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF (XRLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DEEF

1D
-0.08%
1M
2.38%
YTD
10.24%
6M
13.08%
1Y
23.80%
3Y*
17.65%
5Y*
7.51%
10Y*
8.28%

XRLV

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEEF vs. XRLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DEEF
Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF
10.24%32.36%2.77%16.99%-16.94%9.22%7.90%19.30%-14.50%29.23%
XRLV
Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF
6.34%4.11%14.11%0.06%-4.77%27.39%2.56%29.80%-3.28%23.51%

Correlation

The correlation between DEEF and XRLV is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2015

0.58

Over the past year, the correlation between DEEF and XRLV has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DEEF vs. XRLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DEEF
XRLV

Industrials

23.4%
7.2%

Financial Services

14.2%
16.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

9.7%
15.3%

Basic Materials

9.6%
3.1%

Utilities

6.8%
21.5%

Real Estate

5.4%
11.6%

Energy

4.9%
1.1%

Technology

4.8%
5.6%

Healthcare

4.4%
8.4%

Communication Services

4.2%
2.8%

Industrials

DEEF
23.4%
XRLV
7.2%

Financial Services

DEEF
14.2%
XRLV
16.3%

Consumer Cyclical

DEEF
10.8%
XRLV
7.1%

Consumer Defensive

DEEF
9.7%
XRLV
15.3%

Basic Materials

DEEF
9.6%
XRLV
3.1%

Utilities

DEEF
6.8%
XRLV
21.5%

Real Estate

DEEF
5.4%
XRLV
11.6%

Energy

DEEF
4.9%
XRLV
1.1%

Technology

DEEF
4.8%
XRLV
5.6%

Healthcare

DEEF
4.4%
XRLV
8.4%

Communication Services

DEEF
4.2%
XRLV
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DEEF vs. XRLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEEF
DEEF Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
DEEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEEF Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
DEEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEEF Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

XRLV
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEEF vs. XRLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF (DEEF) and Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF (XRLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DEEFXRLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.82

DEEF vs. XRLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DEEFXRLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

Drawdowns

DEEF vs. XRLV - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DEEFXRLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

Volatility

DEEF vs. XRLV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DEEFXRLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.29%

DEEF vs. XRLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEEF has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than XRLV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DEEF vs. XRLV - Dividend Comparison

DEEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, more than XRLV's 1.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DEEF
Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF
3.38%3.63%4.04%3.96%3.31%3.84%2.71%3.74%2.80%2.61%4.35%0.00%
XRLV
Invesco S&P 500 ex-Rate Sensitive Low Volatility ETF
1.53%2.15%1.94%2.57%1.96%1.26%1.65%1.66%1.76%1.39%1.71%1.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


DEEF and XRLV have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DEEF is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DEEF is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XRLV.

DEEF has the higher dividend yield at 3.38%, compared with 1.53% for XRLV.

DEEF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while XRLV is S&P 500. DEEF tracks FTSE Developed ex US Comprehensive Factor Net Tax (US RIC) Index, while XRLV tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility Rate Response Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for DEEF and 0.25% for XRLV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DEEF and XRLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer