DEEF vs. QLVD

Last updated Jun 7, 2026

DEEF (Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF) and QLVD (FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - DEEF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed ex US Comprehensive Factor Net Tax (US RIC) Index, while QLVD is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Northern Trust Developed Markets ex US Quality Low Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DEEF returned 7.10%/yr vs 5.76%/yr for QLVD. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DEEF charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for QLVD.

Performance

DEEF vs. QLVD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF (DEEF) and FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEEF achieves a 8.14% return, which is significantly higher than QLVD's 2.35% return.

DEEF

• 1D: -0.78%
• 1M: -3.20%
• YTD: 8.14%
• 6M: 10.63%
• 1Y: 20.95%
• 3Y*: 16.69%
• 5Y*: 7.10%
• 10Y*: 7.90%

QLVD

• 1D: -1.17%
• 1M: -2.34%
• YTD: 2.35%
• 6M: 4.41%
• 1Y: 6.78%
• 3Y*: 11.45%
• 5Y*: 5.76%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEEF vs. QLVD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
DEEF Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF	8.14%	32.36%	2.77%	16.99%	-16.94%	9.22%	7.90%	6.44%
QLVD FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund	2.35%	24.21%	4.67%	11.57%	-12.09%	9.04%	3.00%	6.35%

Correlation

The correlation between DEEF and QLVD is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019	0.88

The correlation between DEEF and QLVD shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DEEF vs. QLVD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DEEF	QLVD
Industrials	23.3%	15.3%
Financial Services	14.0%	24.3%
Consumer Cyclical	11.0%	5.5%
Basic Materials	9.7%	4.3%
Consumer Defensive	9.7%	11.3%
Utilities	6.7%	7.9%
Real Estate	5.4%	5.3%
Technology	5.0%	5.0%
Energy	4.8%	3.9%
Healthcare	4.4%	10.6%
Communication Services	4.2%	6.7%

Return for Risk

DEEF vs. QLVD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEEF

DEEF Risk / Return Rank: 46
DEEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
DEEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
DEEF Omega Ratio Rank: 48
DEEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
DEEF Martin Ratio Rank: 45

QLVD

QLVD Risk / Return Rank: 21
QLVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
QLVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
QLVD Omega Ratio Rank: 20
QLVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
QLVD Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEEF vs. QLVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF (DEEF) and FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DEEF	QLVD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	0.65	+0.92
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	0.97	+1.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.12	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.01	0.84	+1.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.90	2.46	+4.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DEEF vs. QLVD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEEF Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is higher than the QLVD Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEEF and QLVD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DEEF	QLVD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.57	0.65	+0.92
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48	0.49	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	0.48	+0.01

Drawdowns

DEEF vs. QLVD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEEF drawdown since its inception was -36.48%, which is greater than QLVD's maximum drawdown of -28.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEEF and QLVD.

Drawdown Indicators

	DEEF	QLVD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.48%	-28.20%	-8.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.64%	-8.15%	-2.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.07%	-9.24%	-1.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.08%	-23.99%	-7.09%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.48%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.47%	-6.48%	+1.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.09%	-5.24%	-1.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.09%	2.79%	+0.30%

Volatility

DEEF vs. QLVD - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF (DEEF) has a higher volatility of 3.25% compared to FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD) at 2.81%. This indicates that DEEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QLVD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DEEF	QLVD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.25%	2.81%	+0.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.71%	8.41%	+3.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.58%	10.62%	+2.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.93%	11.74%	+3.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.29%	13.98%	+2.31%

DEEF vs. QLVD - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEEF has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than QLVD's 0.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

DEEF vs. QLVD - Dividend Comparison

DEEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, more than QLVD's 2.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
DEEF Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF	3.44%	3.63%	4.04%	3.96%	3.31%	3.84%	2.71%	3.74%	2.80%	2.61%	4.35%
QLVD FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund	2.79%	2.87%	3.01%	3.33%	2.47%	3.06%	1.78%	1.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DEEF and QLVD in my portfolio?

DEEF and QLVD have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DEEF or QLVD?

DEEF has higher volatility (3.25%) compared to QLVD (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEEF dropped -36.48% vs QLVD's -28.20%.

Which ETF is better, DEEF or QLVD?

On 5-year performance, DEEF leads with 7.10% vs 5.76% for QLVD. On fees, DEEF is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, QLVD has been the lower-risk option at 2.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DEEF or QLVD?

Over the 5-year period, DEEF has performed better with a 7.10% return vs 5.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DEEF or QLVD?

DEEF is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for QLVD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DEEF or QLVD?

DEEF has the higher dividend yield at 3.44%, compared with 2.79% for QLVD.

What is the main difference between DEEF and QLVD?

DEEF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while QLVD is Volatility Hedged Equity. DEEF tracks FTSE Developed ex US Comprehensive Factor Net Tax (US RIC) Index, while QLVD tracks Northern Trust Developed Markets ex US Quality Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for DEEF and 0.32% for QLVD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DEEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.