PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DEEF vs. SPDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DEEF vs. SPDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF (DEEF) and SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEEF achieves a 10.24% return, which is significantly lower than SPDW's 15.00% return. Over the past 10 years, DEEF has underperformed SPDW with an annualized return of 8.28%, while SPDW has yielded a comparatively higher 10.09% annualized return.


DEEF

1D
-0.08%
1M
2.38%
YTD
10.24%
6M
13.08%
1Y
23.80%
3Y*
17.65%
5Y*
7.51%
10Y*
8.28%

SPDW

1D
-0.87%
1M
5.56%
YTD
15.00%
6M
18.06%
1Y
32.15%
3Y*
19.77%
5Y*
9.38%
10Y*
10.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEEF vs. SPDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DEEF
Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF
10.24%32.36%2.77%16.99%-16.94%9.22%7.90%19.30%-14.50%29.23%
SPDW
SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF
15.00%34.75%3.55%17.81%-15.98%11.45%9.90%22.41%-14.22%25.81%

Correlation

The correlation between DEEF and SPDW is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2015

0.88

The correlation between DEEF and SPDW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

DEEF vs. SPDW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DEEF
SPDW

Industrials

23.4%
19.2%

Financial Services

14.2%
22.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

9.7%
5.7%

Basic Materials

9.6%
7.3%

Utilities

6.8%
3.3%

Real Estate

5.4%
2.5%

Energy

4.9%
5.5%

Technology

4.8%
13.7%

Healthcare

4.4%
8.3%

Communication Services

4.2%
3.8%

Industrials

DEEF
23.4%
SPDW
19.2%

Financial Services

DEEF
14.2%
SPDW
22.9%

Consumer Cyclical

DEEF
10.8%
SPDW
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

DEEF
9.7%
SPDW
5.7%

Basic Materials

DEEF
9.6%
SPDW
7.3%

Utilities

DEEF
6.8%
SPDW
3.3%

Real Estate

DEEF
5.4%
SPDW
2.5%

Energy

DEEF
4.9%
SPDW
5.5%

Technology

DEEF
4.8%
SPDW
13.7%

Healthcare

DEEF
4.4%
SPDW
8.3%

Communication Services

DEEF
4.2%
SPDW
3.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DEEF vs. SPDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEEF
DEEF Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
DEEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEEF Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
DEEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEEF Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

SPDW
SPDW Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SPDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPDW Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SPDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPDW Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEEF vs. SPDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF (DEEF) and SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DEEFSPDWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.37

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

2.80

-0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.82

10.93

-3.11

DEEF vs. SPDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEEF Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the SPDW Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEEF and SPDW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DEEFSPDWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

2.07

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.57

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.59

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.24

+0.26

Drawdowns

DEEF vs. SPDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEEF drawdown since its inception was -36.48%, smaller than the maximum SPDW drawdown of -60.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEEF and SPDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DEEFSPDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.48%

-60.02%

+23.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.64%

-11.55%

+0.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.07%

-13.53%

+2.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.08%

-30.21%

-0.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.48%

-34.98%

-1.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.63%

-0.87%

-2.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.09%

-12.91%

+5.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

2.95%

+0.10%

Volatility

DEEF vs. SPDW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF (DEEF) is 3.88%, while SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) has a volatility of 5.63%. This indicates that DEEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DEEFSPDWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.88%

5.63%

-1.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.62%

13.17%

-1.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.53%

15.60%

-2.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.93%

16.49%

-1.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.29%

17.26%

-0.97%

DEEF vs. SPDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEEF has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than SPDW's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DEEF vs. SPDW - Dividend Comparison

DEEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, more than SPDW's 2.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DEEF
Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF
3.38%3.63%4.04%3.96%3.31%3.84%2.71%3.74%2.80%2.61%4.35%0.00%
SPDW
SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF
2.87%3.30%3.19%2.75%3.12%3.04%1.87%3.13%3.08%1.86%3.11%2.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


DEEF and SPDW have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPDW has higher volatility (5.63%) compared to DEEF (3.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEEF dropped -36.48% vs SPDW's -60.02%.

On 10-year performance, SPDW leads with 10.09% vs 8.28% for DEEF. On fees, SPDW is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, DEEF has been the lower-risk option at 3.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPDW has performed better with a 10.09% return vs 8.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPDW is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for DEEF.

DEEF has the higher dividend yield at 3.38%, compared with 2.87% for SPDW.

DEEF tracks FTSE Developed ex US Comprehensive Factor Net Tax (US RIC) Index, while SPDW tracks S&P Developed Ex-U.S. BMI Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for DEEF and 0.04% for SPDW.

SPDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DEEF and SPDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer