PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DEEF vs. ICOW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DEEF vs. ICOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF (DEEF) and Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEEF achieves a 8.99% return, which is significantly lower than ICOW's 17.35% return.


DEEF

1D
-1.14%
1M
-0.84%
YTD
8.99%
6M
11.66%
1Y
21.77%
3Y*
17.30%
5Y*
7.26%
10Y*
8.16%

ICOW

1D
0.00%
1M
1.48%
YTD
17.35%
6M
18.03%
1Y
38.86%
3Y*
20.34%
5Y*
10.06%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEEF vs. ICOW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DEEF
Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF
8.99%32.36%2.77%16.99%-16.94%9.22%7.90%19.30%-14.50%11.00%
ICOW
Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF
17.35%36.95%-2.59%18.94%-7.98%11.52%7.20%17.91%-16.09%16.98%

Correlation

The correlation between DEEF and ICOW is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2017

0.84

The correlation between DEEF and ICOW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

DEEF vs. ICOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DEEF
ICOW

Industrials

23.4%
28.7%

Financial Services

14.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

9.7%
8.5%

Basic Materials

9.6%
5.4%

Utilities

6.8%

-

Real Estate

5.4%

-

Energy

4.9%
23.7%

Technology

4.8%
6.2%

Healthcare

4.4%
7.1%

Communication Services

4.2%
8.9%

Industrials

DEEF
23.4%
ICOW
28.7%

Financial Services

DEEF
14.2%
ICOW

-

Consumer Cyclical

DEEF
10.8%
ICOW
11.6%

Consumer Defensive

DEEF
9.7%
ICOW
8.5%

Basic Materials

DEEF
9.6%
ICOW
5.4%

Utilities

DEEF
6.8%
ICOW

-

Real Estate

DEEF
5.4%
ICOW

-

Energy

DEEF
4.9%
ICOW
23.7%

Technology

DEEF
4.8%
ICOW
6.2%

Healthcare

DEEF
4.4%
ICOW
7.1%

Communication Services

DEEF
4.2%
ICOW
8.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DEEF vs. ICOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEEF
DEEF Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
DEEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEEF Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
DEEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEEF Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

ICOW
ICOW Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
ICOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICOW Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
ICOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICOW Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEEF vs. ICOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF (DEEF) and Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DEEFICOWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.50

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

4.87

-2.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.12

17.40

-10.29

DEEF vs. ICOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEEF Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is lower than the ICOW Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEEF and ICOW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DEEFICOWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

2.85

-1.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.61

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.55

-0.06

Drawdowns

DEEF vs. ICOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEEF drawdown since its inception was -36.48%, smaller than the maximum ICOW drawdown of -43.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEEF and ICOW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DEEFICOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.48%

-43.49%

+7.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.64%

-8.02%

-2.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.07%

-14.81%

+3.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.08%

-28.48%

-2.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.72%

-0.63%

-4.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.09%

-7.58%

+0.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

2.24%

+0.83%

Volatility

DEEF vs. ICOW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF (DEEF) is 3.51%, while Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) has a volatility of 3.99%. This indicates that DEEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DEEFICOWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.51%

3.99%

-0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.68%

10.58%

+1.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.56%

13.72%

-0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.94%

16.64%

-1.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.29%

18.46%

-2.17%

DEEF vs. ICOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEEF has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than ICOW's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

DEEF vs. ICOW - Dividend Comparison

DEEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, more than ICOW's 2.71% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DEEF
Xtrackers FTSE Developed ex US Multifactor ETF
3.42%3.63%4.04%3.96%3.31%3.84%2.71%3.74%2.80%2.61%4.35%
ICOW
Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF
2.71%3.03%4.39%3.61%5.26%2.11%2.46%3.10%2.61%0.80%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DEEF and ICOW have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ICOW has higher volatility (3.99%) compared to DEEF (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEEF dropped -36.48% vs ICOW's -43.49%.

On 5-year performance, ICOW leads with 10.06% vs 7.26% for DEEF. On fees, DEEF is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, DEEF has been the lower-risk option at 3.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ICOW has performed better with a 10.06% return vs 7.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DEEF is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ICOW.

DEEF has the higher dividend yield at 3.42%, compared with 2.71% for ICOW.

DEEF tracks FTSE Developed ex US Comprehensive Factor Net Tax (US RIC) Index, while ICOW tracks Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for DEEF and 0.65% for ICOW.

ICOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DEEF and ICOW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer