DECU vs. AIOO

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

DECU (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF) and AIOO (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds from Allianz. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DECU returned 15.55% vs 5.08% for AIOO. Their correlation of 0.81 means they have usually moved in the same direction. DECU charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for AIOO.

Performance

DECU vs. AIOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF (DECU) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF (AIOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DECU achieves a 7.58% return, which is significantly higher than AIOO's 2.52% return.

DECU

• 1D: 1.11%
• 1M: 1.26%
• 6M: 6.33%
• YTD: 7.58%
• 1Y: 15.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.17%

AIOO

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.30%
• 6M: 2.09%
• YTD: 2.52%
• 1Y: 5.08%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AIOO AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF	$392.91K	$307.57K	$419.98K
DECU AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF	$211.45K	$142.94K	$292.77K

DECU vs. AIOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DECU AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF	7.58%	7.54%
AIOO AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF	2.52%	2.65%

Correlation

The correlation between DECU and AIOO is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025	0.81

The correlation between DECU and AIOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DECU vs. AIOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DECU

DECU Risk / Return Rank: 63
DECU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
DECU Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
DECU Omega Ratio Rank: 58
DECU Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
DECU Martin Ratio Rank: 68

AIOO

AIOO Risk / Return Rank: 94
AIOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
AIOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
AIOO Omega Ratio Rank: 93
AIOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
AIOO Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DECU vs. AIOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF (DECU) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF (AIOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DECU	AIOO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.58	2.50	-0.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.19	3.89	-1.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.48	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.76	6.89	-4.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.02	19.90	-10.88

DECU vs. AIOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DECU Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is lower than the AIOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DECU and AIOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DECU vs. AIOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DECU drawdown since its inception was -10.66%, which is greater than AIOO's maximum drawdown of -0.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DECU and AIOO.

Drawdown Indicators

	DECU	AIOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.66%	-0.74%	-9.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.65%	-0.74%	-4.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.62%	-0.02%	-0.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.74%	-0.18%	-1.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.73%	0.26%	+1.47%

Volatility

DECU vs. AIOO - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF (DECU) has a higher volatility of 3.12% compared to AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF (AIOO) at 0.39%. This indicates that DECU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AIOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DECU	AIOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.12%	0.39%	+2.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.51%	1.39%	+6.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.91%	2.04%	+7.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.82%	2.02%	+8.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.82%	2.02%	+8.80%

DECU vs. AIOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DECU has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than AIOO's 0.64% expense ratio.

Dividends

DECU vs. AIOO - Dividend Comparison

Neither DECU nor AIOO has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DECU and AIOO in my portfolio?

DECU and AIOO have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DECU or AIOO?

DECU has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to AIOO (0.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DECU dropped -10.66% vs AIOO's -0.74%.

Which ETF is better, DECU or AIOO?

On 1-year performance, DECU leads with 15.55% vs 5.08% for AIOO. On fees, AIOO is cheaper at 0.64% per year. On volatility, AIOO has been the lower-risk option at 0.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DECU or AIOO?

Over the 1-year period, DECU has performed better with a 15.55% return vs 5.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DECU or AIOO?

AIOO is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for DECU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DECU or AIOO?

DECU and AIOO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between DECU and AIOO?

Their fees differ too: 0.74% for DECU and 0.64% for AIOO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AIOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.