DECU vs. SPBW

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

DECU (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF) and SPBW (AllianzIM Buffer20 Allocation ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds from AllianzIM. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DECU returned 17.35% vs 12.30% for SPBW. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DECU charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for SPBW.

Performance

DECU vs. SPBW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF (DECU) and AllianzIM Buffer20 Allocation ETF (SPBW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DECU achieves a 6.35% return, which is significantly higher than SPBW's 4.52% return.

DECU

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: -0.33%
• YTD: 6.35%
• 6M: 6.35%
• 1Y: 17.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SPBW

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 0.39%
• YTD: 4.52%
• 6M: 4.60%
• 1Y: 12.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DECU vs. SPBW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DECU AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF	6.35%	11.32%
SPBW AllianzIM Buffer20 Allocation ETF	4.52%	9.64%

Correlation

The correlation between DECU and SPBW is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2025	0.93

The correlation between DECU and SPBW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DECU vs. SPBW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DECU

DECU Risk / Return Rank: 58
DECU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
DECU Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
DECU Omega Ratio Rank: 55
DECU Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
DECU Martin Ratio Rank: 62

SPBW

SPBW Risk / Return Rank: 91
SPBW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
SPBW Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
SPBW Omega Ratio Rank: 93
SPBW Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
SPBW Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DECU vs. SPBW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF (DECU) and AllianzIM Buffer20 Allocation ETF (SPBW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DECU	SPBW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.85	2.96	-1.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.54	4.46	-1.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.63	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.08	4.32	-1.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.98	23.02	-12.03

DECU vs. SPBW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DECU Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is lower than the SPBW Sharpe Ratio of 2.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DECU and SPBW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DECU vs. SPBW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DECU drawdown since its inception was -10.66%, which is greater than SPBW's maximum drawdown of -8.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DECU and SPBW.

Drawdown Indicators

	DECU	SPBW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.66%	-8.76%	-1.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.65%	-2.86%	-2.79%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.75%	-0.17%	-1.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.73%	-0.76%	-0.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.58%	0.54%	+1.04%

Volatility

DECU vs. SPBW - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF (DECU) has a higher volatility of 3.71% compared to AllianzIM Buffer20 Allocation ETF (SPBW) at 1.28%. This indicates that DECU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPBW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DECU	SPBW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.71%	1.28%	+2.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.92%	3.31%	+3.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.42%	4.19%	+5.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.77%	7.55%	+3.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.77%	7.55%	+3.22%

DECU vs. SPBW - Expense Ratio Comparison

DECU has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than SPBW's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

DECU vs. SPBW - Dividend Comparison

Neither DECU nor SPBW has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DECU and SPBW in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, DECU and SPBW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, DECU or SPBW?

DECU has higher volatility (3.71%) compared to SPBW (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DECU dropped -10.66% vs SPBW's -8.76%.

Which ETF is better, DECU or SPBW?

On 1-year performance, DECU leads with 17.35% vs 12.30% for SPBW. On fees, DECU is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, SPBW has been the lower-risk option at 1.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DECU or SPBW?

Over the 1-year period, DECU has performed better with a 17.35% return vs 12.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DECU or SPBW?

DECU is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for SPBW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DECU or SPBW?

DECU and SPBW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between DECU and SPBW?

Their fees differ too: 0.74% for DECU and 0.79% for SPBW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SPBW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.