DECU vs. NVBU
DECU (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF) and NVBU (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Nov ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds from AllianzIM. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DECU returned 17.35% vs 19.35% for NVBU. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.74% expense ratio.
Performance
DECU vs. NVBU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with DECU at 6.35% and NVBU at 6.35%.
DECU
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- YTD
- 6.35%
- 6M
- 6.35%
- 1Y
- 17.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVBU
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- YTD
- 6.35%
- 6M
- 6.16%
- 1Y
- 19.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DECU vs. NVBU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DECU AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF | 6.35% | 11.52% | -2.03% |
NVBU AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Nov ETF | 6.35% | 13.27% | -2.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between DECU and NVBU is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2024 | 0.97 |
The correlation between DECU and NVBU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DECU vs. NVBU — Risk / Return Rank
DECU
NVBU
DECU vs. NVBU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF (DECU) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Nov ETF (NVBU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DECU | NVBU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.37 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | 3.61 | -0.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.98 | 13.72 | -2.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DECU vs. NVBU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DECU drawdown since its inception was -10.66%, smaller than the maximum NVBU drawdown of -11.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DECU and NVBU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DECU | NVBU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.66% | -11.97% | +1.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.65% | -5.38% | -0.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.75% | -1.70% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.73% | -1.78% | +0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.58% | 1.41% | +0.17% |
Volatility
DECU vs. NVBU - Volatility Comparison
AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF (DECU) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Nov ETF (NVBU) have volatilities of 3.71% and 3.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DECU | NVBU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.71% | 3.61% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.92% | 6.76% | +0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.42% | 9.57% | -0.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.77% | 11.19% | -0.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.77% | 11.19% | -0.42% |
DECU vs. NVBU - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DECU and NVBU have an expense ratio of 0.74%.
Dividends
DECU vs. NVBU - Dividend Comparison
Neither DECU nor NVBU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, DECU and NVBU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DECU has higher volatility (3.71%) compared to NVBU (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DECU dropped -10.66% vs NVBU's -11.97%.
On 1-year performance, NVBU leads with 19.35% vs 17.35% for DECU. Both ETFs have the same 0.74% expense ratio. On volatility, NVBU has been the lower-risk option at 3.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NVBU has performed better with a 19.35% return vs 17.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DECU and NVBU have the same expense ratio: 0.74% per year.
DECU and NVBU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
NVBU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DECU and NVBU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer