PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DECU vs. NVBU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DECU vs. NVBU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF (DECU) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Nov ETF (NVBU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with DECU at 6.35% and NVBU at 6.35%.


DECU

1D
-0.41%
1M
-0.33%
YTD
6.35%
6M
6.35%
1Y
17.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVBU

1D
-0.37%
1M
-0.11%
YTD
6.35%
6M
6.16%
1Y
19.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DECU vs. NVBU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DECU and NVBU is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2024

0.97

The correlation between DECU and NVBU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DECU vs. NVBU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DECU
DECU Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
DECU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DECU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
DECU Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
DECU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
DECU Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

NVBU
NVBU Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
NVBU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVBU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVBU Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
NVBU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVBU Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DECU vs. NVBU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF (DECU) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Nov ETF (NVBU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DECUNVBUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.37

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

3.61

-0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.98

13.72

-2.74

DECU vs. NVBU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DECU Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the NVBU Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DECU and NVBU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DECU vs. NVBU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DECU drawdown since its inception was -10.66%, smaller than the maximum NVBU drawdown of -11.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DECU and NVBU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DECUNVBUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.66%

-11.97%

+1.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.65%

-5.38%

-0.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.75%

-1.70%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.73%

-1.78%

+0.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.58%

1.41%

+0.17%

Volatility

DECU vs. NVBU - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF (DECU) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Nov ETF (NVBU) have volatilities of 3.71% and 3.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DECUNVBUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.71%

3.61%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.92%

6.76%

+0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.42%

9.57%

-0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.77%

11.19%

-0.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.77%

11.19%

-0.42%

DECU vs. NVBU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DECU and NVBU have an expense ratio of 0.74%.


Dividends

DECU vs. NVBU - Dividend Comparison

Neither DECU nor NVBU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, DECU and NVBU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DECU has higher volatility (3.71%) compared to NVBU (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DECU dropped -10.66% vs NVBU's -11.97%.

On 1-year performance, NVBU leads with 19.35% vs 17.35% for DECU. Both ETFs have the same 0.74% expense ratio. On volatility, NVBU has been the lower-risk option at 3.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NVBU has performed better with a 19.35% return vs 17.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DECU and NVBU have the same expense ratio: 0.74% per year.

DECU and NVBU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

NVBU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DECU and NVBU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer