DECK vs. LNG
DECK (Deckers Outdoor Corporation) and LNG (Cheniere Energy, Inc.) are both stocks. DECK operates in Footwear & Accessories (Consumer Cyclical), while LNG operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy). Over the past 10 years, DECK returned 28.83%/yr vs 22.78%/yr for LNG. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DECK vs. LNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DECK achieves a 9.80% return, which is significantly lower than LNG's 24.74% return. Over the past 10 years, DECK has outperformed LNG with an annualized return of 28.83%, while LNG has yielded a comparatively lower 22.78% annualized return.
DECK
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 21.67%
- YTD
- 9.80%
- 6M
- 12.50%
- 1Y
- 12.17%
- 3Y*
- 11.65%
- 5Y*
- 15.35%
- 10Y*
- 28.83%
LNG
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- -0.23%
- YTD
- 24.74%
- 6M
- 28.05%
- 1Y
- 2.23%
- 3Y*
- 19.57%
- 5Y*
- 23.34%
- 10Y*
- 22.78%
DECK vs. LNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DECK Deckers Outdoor Corporation | 9.80% | -48.95% | 82.30% | 67.46% | 8.97% | 27.73% | 69.83% | 31.97% | 59.44% | 44.88% |
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 24.74% | -8.70% | 27.18% | 15.02% | 49.30% | 69.48% | -1.70% | 3.18% | 9.94% | 29.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between DECK and LNG is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 1997 | 0.16 |
The correlation between DECK and LNG shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.18 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
DECK:
$16.11B
LNG:
$50.79B
DECK:
$6.98
LNG:
$6.80
DECK:
16.31
LNG:
35.48
DECK:
0.59
LNG:
0.19
DECK:
3.05
LNG:
2.58
DECK:
6.44
LNG:
13.53
DECK:
$5.47B
LNG:
$20.28B
DECK:
$3.16B
LNG:
$5.52B
DECK:
$1.31B
LNG:
$5.81B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DECK vs. LNG — Risk / Return Rank
DECK
LNG
DECK vs. LNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) and Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DECK | LNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.05 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | 0.15 | +0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.34 | 0.31 | +0.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DECK vs. LNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DECK drawdown since its inception was -94.36%, roughly equal to the maximum LNG drawdown of -97.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DECK and LNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DECK | LNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.36% | -97.84% | +3.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.81% | -24.09% | -11.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.35% | -24.87% | -39.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.35% | -24.87% | -39.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.35% | -57.53% | -6.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.98% | -18.55% | -30.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.35% | -43.14% | +2.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.87% | 11.88% | +4.99% |
Volatility
DECK vs. LNG - Volatility Comparison
Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) has a higher volatility of 10.35% compared to Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) at 7.19%. This indicates that DECK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DECK | LNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.35% | 7.19% | +3.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.08% | 21.49% | +9.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.42% | 27.02% | +18.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.98% | 30.27% | +13.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.47% | 32.50% | +9.97% |
Dividends
DECK vs. LNG - Dividend Comparison
DECK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DECK Deckers Outdoor Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 0.90% | 1.06% | 0.84% | 0.95% | 0.92% | 0.33% |
Financials
DECK vs. LNG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Deckers Outdoor Corporation and Cheniere Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
DECK vs. LNG - Profitability Comparison
DECK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deckers Outdoor Corporation reported a gross profit of 644.64M and revenue of 1.12B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.6%.
LNG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
DECK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deckers Outdoor Corporation reported an operating income of 156.73M and revenue of 1.12B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.0%.
LNG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of -3.49B and revenue of 5.87B, resulting in an operating margin of -59.4%.
DECK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deckers Outdoor Corporation reported a net income of 135.57M and revenue of 1.12B, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.
LNG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a net income of -3.50B and revenue of 5.87B, resulting in a net margin of -59.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
DECK and LNG have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DECK has higher volatility (10.35%) compared to LNG (7.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DECK dropped -94.36% vs LNG's -97.84%.
LNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.14 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DECK and LNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer