DE vs. WDS
DE (Deere & Company) and WDS (Woodside Energy Group Ltd) are both stocks. DE operates in Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery (Industrials), while WDS operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy). Over the past 10 years, DE returned 23.07%/yr vs 7.93%/yr for WDS. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DE vs. WDS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DE achieves a 24.40% return, which is significantly lower than WDS's 52.08% return. Over the past 10 years, DE has outperformed WDS with an annualized return of 23.07%, while WDS has yielded a comparatively lower 7.93% annualized return.
DE
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- -0.55%
- YTD
- 24.40%
- 6M
- 19.88%
- 1Y
- 13.19%
- 3Y*
- 14.77%
- 5Y*
- 12.54%
- 10Y*
- 23.07%
WDS
- 1D
- 6.17%
- 1M
- 2.76%
- YTD
- 52.08%
- 6M
- 46.18%
- 1Y
- 58.11%
- 3Y*
- 6.16%
- 5Y*
- 12.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.93%
DE vs. WDS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DE Deere & Company | 24.40% | 11.39% | 7.56% | -5.48% | 26.59% | 28.86% | 57.96% | 18.30% | -2.90% | 54.83% |
WDS Woodside Energy Group Ltd | 52.08% | 6.78% | -20.60% | -4.42% | 68.06% | -6.77% | -24.23% | 14.38% | -9.70% | 19.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between DE and WDS is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2007 | 0.38 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DE and WDS has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.38, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
DE:
$17.76
WDS:
$3.29
DE:
32.52
WDS:
7.02
DE:
7.64
WDS:
0.24
DE:
3.40
WDS:
1.69
DE:
$46.01B
WDS:
$26.15B
DE:
$16.40B
WDS:
$9.87B
DE:
$11.54B
WDS:
$17.06B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DE vs. WDS — Risk / Return Rank
DE
WDS
DE vs. WDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Deere & Company (DE) and Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DE | WDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.32 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.67 | 3.40 | -2.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.38 | 7.88 | -6.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DE vs. WDS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DE drawdown since its inception was -73.27%, roughly equal to the maximum WDS drawdown of -77.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DE and WDS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DE | WDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.27% | -77.06% | +3.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.90% | -17.16% | -2.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.59% | -48.77% | +27.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.81% | -48.77% | +14.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.91% | -66.16% | +28.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.58% | -10.20% | -2.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.61% | -39.55% | +20.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.58% | 7.40% | +2.18% |
Volatility
DE vs. WDS - Volatility Comparison
Deere & Company (DE) and Woodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS) have volatilities of 10.51% and 10.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DE | WDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.51% | 10.13% | +0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.42% | 24.23% | +0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.03% | 30.62% | -0.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.39% | 33.40% | -4.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.40% | 33.78% | -3.38% |
Dividends
DE vs. WDS - Dividend Comparison
DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than WDS's 4.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DE Deere & Company | 1.12% | 1.39% | 1.42% | 1.33% | 1.05% | 1.14% | 1.13% | 1.75% | 1.84% | 1.53% | 2.33% | 3.15% |
WDS Woodside Energy Group Ltd | 4.85% | 6.80% | 8.27% | 10.62% | 8.84% | 2.39% | 4.41% | 5.12% | 5.45% | 3.65% | 5.21% | 9.84% |
Financials
DE vs. WDS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Deere & Company and Woodside Energy Group Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
DE vs. WDS - Profitability Comparison
DE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deere & Company reported a gross profit of 3.33B and revenue of 9.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.7%.
WDS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Woodside Energy Group Ltd reported a gross profit of 1.99B and revenue of 6.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.1%.
DE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deere & Company reported an operating income of 1.56B and revenue of 9.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.2%.
WDS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Woodside Energy Group Ltd reported an operating income of 1.67B and revenue of 6.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.1%.
DE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deere & Company reported a net income of 656.00M and revenue of 9.61B, resulting in a net margin of 6.8%.
WDS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Woodside Energy Group Ltd reported a net income of 1.40B and revenue of 6.39B, resulting in a net margin of 21.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
DE and WDS have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DE has higher volatility (10.51%) compared to WDS (10.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DE dropped -73.27% vs WDS's -77.06%.
WDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DE and WDS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer