PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDWM vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDWM vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDWM achieves a 7.16% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 11.69% return. Over the past 10 years, DDWM has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 10.42%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.65% annualized return.


DDWM

1D
0.40%
1M
2.50%
YTD
7.16%
6M
9.88%
1Y
20.15%
3Y*
18.10%
5Y*
12.49%
10Y*
10.42%

VOO

1D
0.14%
1M
5.39%
YTD
11.69%
6M
12.11%
1Y
29.68%
3Y*
22.73%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
15.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDWM vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DDWM
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund
7.16%30.07%10.70%15.25%-0.77%14.84%-4.56%21.43%-11.75%18.80%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
11.69%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between DDWM and VOO is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2016

0.74

The correlation between DDWM and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

DDWM vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DDWM
VOO

Industrials

21.1%
8.3%

Financial Services

20.6%
11.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
10.2%

Healthcare

8.8%
8.5%

Technology

8.1%
35.7%

Consumer Defensive

7.5%
4.9%

Communication Services

5.5%
11.3%

Utilities

5.5%
2.4%

Basic Materials

5.4%
1.8%

Energy

4.1%
3.5%

Real Estate

3.1%
1.9%

Industrials

DDWM
21.1%
VOO
8.3%

Financial Services

DDWM
20.6%
VOO
11.6%

Consumer Cyclical

DDWM
10.3%
VOO
10.2%

Healthcare

DDWM
8.8%
VOO
8.5%

Technology

DDWM
8.1%
VOO
35.7%

Consumer Defensive

DDWM
7.5%
VOO
4.9%

Communication Services

DDWM
5.5%
VOO
11.3%

Utilities

DDWM
5.5%
VOO
2.4%

Basic Materials

DDWM
5.4%
VOO
1.8%

Energy

DDWM
4.1%
VOO
3.5%

Real Estate

DDWM
3.1%
VOO
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDWM vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDWM
DDWM Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
DDWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDWM Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
DDWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDWM Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDWM vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DDWMVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.61

2.53

-0.92

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.24

3.43

-1.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.46

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

3.42

-1.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.39

15.95

-8.56

DDWM vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDWM Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDWM and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDWMVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

2.53

-0.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

0.85

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.87

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.89

-0.19

Drawdowns

DDWM vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDWM drawdown since its inception was -35.00%, roughly equal to the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDWM and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDWMVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.00%

-33.99%

-1.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.56%

-8.90%

-1.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.34%

-18.69%

+6.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.79%

-24.52%

+9.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

-33.99%

-1.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.23%

0.00%

-2.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.05%

-3.69%

-0.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

1.91%

+0.96%

Volatility

DDWM vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) has a higher volatility of 3.99% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.74%. This indicates that DDWM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDWMVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.99%

2.74%

+1.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.43%

8.88%

+1.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.61%

11.78%

+0.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.32%

16.81%

-3.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.32%

18.01%

-2.69%

DDWM vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDWM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDWM vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

DDWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, more than VOO's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DDWM
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund
2.31%2.47%3.57%4.46%4.28%3.73%3.52%3.63%4.40%2.65%4.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.02%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDWM and VOO have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DDWM has higher volatility (3.99%) compared to VOO (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDWM dropped -35.00% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.65% vs 10.42% for DDWM. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.65% return vs 10.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for DDWM.

DDWM has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 1.02% for VOO.

DDWM is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. DDWM tracks WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for DDWM and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDWM and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer