PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDWM vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDWM vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDWM achieves a 7.47% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 24.03% return. Over the past 10 years, DDWM has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 10.95%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 25.19% annualized return.


DDWM

1D
0.43%
1M
0.58%
YTD
7.47%
6M
9.21%
1Y
20.71%
3Y*
17.66%
5Y*
12.32%
10Y*
10.95%

VGT

1D
0.58%
1M
1.35%
YTD
24.03%
6M
24.13%
1Y
50.48%
3Y*
29.84%
5Y*
20.35%
10Y*
25.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDWM vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DDWM
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund
7.47%30.07%10.70%15.25%-0.77%14.84%-4.56%21.43%-11.75%18.80%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
24.03%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%

Correlation

The correlation between DDWM and VGT is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2016

0.61

The correlation between DDWM and VGT shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.62 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DDWM vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DDWM
VGT

Industrials

21.1%
0.4%

Financial Services

20.7%
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
0.1%

Technology

9.0%
98.5%

Healthcare

8.6%
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

7.4%

-

Basic Materials

5.5%
0.0%

Communication Services

5.4%
0.5%

Utilities

5.2%

-

Energy

3.7%
0.3%

Real Estate

3.0%

-

Industrials

DDWM
21.1%
VGT
0.4%

Financial Services

DDWM
20.7%
VGT
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

DDWM
10.6%
VGT
0.1%

Technology

DDWM
9.0%
VGT
98.5%

Healthcare

DDWM
8.6%
VGT
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

DDWM
7.4%
VGT

-

Basic Materials

DDWM
5.5%
VGT
0.0%

Communication Services

DDWM
5.4%
VGT
0.5%

Utilities

DDWM
5.2%
VGT

-

Energy

DDWM
3.7%
VGT
0.3%

Real Estate

DDWM
3.0%
VGT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDWM vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDWM
DDWM Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
DDWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDWM Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
DDWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDWM Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDWM vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DDWMVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.36

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

2.94

-1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.73

9.11

-2.38

DDWM vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDWM Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is lower than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDWM and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DDWM vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDWM drawdown since its inception was -35.00%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDWM and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDWMVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.00%

-54.63%

+19.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.56%

-16.40%

+5.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.34%

-27.23%

+14.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.79%

-35.07%

+20.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

-35.07%

+0.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.94%

-7.18%

+5.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.05%

-7.95%

+3.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

5.28%

-2.35%

Volatility

DDWM vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) is 4.34%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 10.00%. This indicates that DDWM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDWMVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.34%

10.00%

-5.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.94%

18.00%

-7.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.03%

22.00%

-8.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.40%

25.40%

-12.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.31%

24.72%

-9.41%

DDWM vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDWM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDWM vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

DDWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, more than VGT's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DDWM
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund
2.31%2.47%3.57%4.46%4.28%3.73%3.52%3.63%4.40%2.65%4.00%0.00%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.33%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDWM and VGT have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (10.00%) compared to DDWM (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDWM dropped -35.00% vs VGT's -54.63%.

On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 25.19% vs 10.95% for DDWM. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, DDWM has been the lower-risk option at 4.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 25.19% return vs 10.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for DDWM.

DDWM has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 0.33% for VGT.

DDWM is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while VGT is Technology Equities. DDWM tracks WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for DDWM and 0.09% for VGT.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDWM and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer