PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDWM vs. QGRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDWM vs. QGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDWM achieves a 6.51% return, which is significantly lower than QGRW's 15.43% return.


DDWM

1D
-0.60%
1M
3.18%
YTD
6.51%
6M
8.98%
1Y
20.03%
3Y*
17.86%
5Y*
12.22%
10Y*
10.36%

QGRW

1D
-1.04%
1M
9.03%
YTD
15.43%
6M
14.57%
1Y
35.66%
3Y*
29.10%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDWM vs. QGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DDWM
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund
6.51%30.07%10.70%15.25%-0.23%
QGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund
15.43%19.20%34.85%56.05%-3.30%

Correlation

The correlation between DDWM and QGRW is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2022

0.53

The correlation between DDWM and QGRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

DDWM vs. QGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DDWM
QGRW

Industrials

21.1%
8.0%

Financial Services

20.6%
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
12.4%

Healthcare

8.8%
4.3%

Technology

8.1%
52.1%

Consumer Defensive

7.5%
0.5%

Communication Services

5.5%
17.8%

Utilities

5.5%
0.4%

Basic Materials

5.4%

-

Energy

4.1%
0.6%

Real Estate

3.1%

-

Industrials

DDWM
21.1%
QGRW
8.0%

Financial Services

DDWM
20.6%
QGRW
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

DDWM
10.3%
QGRW
12.4%

Healthcare

DDWM
8.8%
QGRW
4.3%

Technology

DDWM
8.1%
QGRW
52.1%

Consumer Defensive

DDWM
7.5%
QGRW
0.5%

Communication Services

DDWM
5.5%
QGRW
17.8%

Utilities

DDWM
5.5%
QGRW
0.4%

Basic Materials

DDWM
5.4%
QGRW

-

Energy

DDWM
4.1%
QGRW
0.6%

Real Estate

DDWM
3.1%
QGRW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDWM vs. QGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDWM
DDWM Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
DDWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDWM Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
DDWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDWM Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

QGRW
QGRW Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
QGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
QGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
QGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
QGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDWM vs. QGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DDWMQGRWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.60

2.06

-0.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.23

2.75

-0.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.35

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

2.32

-0.42

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.99

9.08

-2.10

DDWM vs. QGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDWM Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the QGRW Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDWM and QGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDWMQGRWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

2.06

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

1.66

-0.96

Drawdowns

DDWM vs. QGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDWM drawdown since its inception was -35.00%, which is greater than QGRW's maximum drawdown of -24.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDWM and QGRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDWMQGRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.00%

-24.40%

-10.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.56%

-15.44%

+4.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.34%

-24.40%

+12.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.82%

-1.33%

-1.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.05%

-3.26%

-0.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

3.94%

-1.07%

Volatility

DDWM vs. QGRW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund (DDWM) is 3.80%, while WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) has a volatility of 4.71%. This indicates that DDWM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDWMQGRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.80%

4.71%

-0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.44%

13.67%

-3.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.60%

17.40%

-4.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.33%

21.08%

-7.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.31%

21.08%

-5.77%

DDWM vs. QGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDWM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than QGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDWM vs. QGRW - Dividend Comparison

DDWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, more than QGRW's 0.07% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DDWM
WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Fund
2.33%2.47%3.57%4.46%4.28%3.73%3.52%3.63%4.40%2.65%4.00%
QGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund
0.07%0.09%0.14%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDWM and QGRW have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QGRW has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to DDWM (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDWM dropped -35.00% vs QGRW's -24.40%.

On 3-year performance, QGRW leads with 29.10% vs 17.86% for DDWM. On fees, QGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DDWM has been the lower-risk option at 3.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, QGRW has performed better with a 29.10% return vs 17.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for DDWM.

DDWM has the higher dividend yield at 2.33%, compared with 0.07% for QGRW.

DDWM is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while QGRW is Large Cap Growth Equities. DDWM tracks WisdomTree Dynamic Currency Hedged International Equity Index, while QGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for DDWM and 0.28% for QGRW.

QGRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDWM and QGRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer