PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDSQ vs. QB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDSQ vs. QB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (DDSQ) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DDSQ

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.60%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QB

1D
-1.22%
1M
-0.18%
YTD
9.56%
6M
9.37%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDSQ vs. QB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DDSQ and QB is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2026

0.62

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDSQ vs. QB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (DDSQ) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (QB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DDSQ vs. QB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DDSQ vs. QB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDSQ drawdown since its inception was -3.69%, which is greater than QB's maximum drawdown of -3.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDSQ and QB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDSQQBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.69%

-3.47%

-0.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-1.51%

+1.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.32%

-0.41%

+0.09%

Volatility

DDSQ vs. QB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDSQQBDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.07%

6.85%

+4.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.07%

6.85%

+4.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.07%

6.85%

+4.22%

DDSQ vs. QB - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDSQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than QB's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDSQ vs. QB - Dividend Comparison

DDSQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DDSQ and QB have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QB is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QB is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DDSQ.

QB has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.00% for DDSQ.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDSQ and 0.58% for QB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDSQ and QB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer