PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDSQ vs. LOUP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDSQ vs. LOUP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (DDSQ) and Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DDSQ

1D
0.00%
1M
1.06%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LOUP

1D
-1.87%
1M
18.57%
YTD
28.21%
6M
26.83%
1Y
75.49%
3Y*
37.37%
5Y*
12.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDSQ vs. LOUP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DDSQ and LOUP is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2026

0.65

DDSQ vs. LOUP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DDSQ
LOUP

Technology

36.2%
51.0%

Financial Services

11.9%
4.5%

Communication Services

10.9%
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
5.5%

Healthcare

8.4%
2.7%

Industrials

8.1%
20.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

3.5%
2.9%

Utilities

2.3%
2.8%

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%

-

Technology

DDSQ
36.2%
LOUP
51.0%

Financial Services

DDSQ
11.9%
LOUP
4.5%

Communication Services

DDSQ
10.9%
LOUP
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

DDSQ
10.1%
LOUP
5.5%

Healthcare

DDSQ
8.4%
LOUP
2.7%

Industrials

DDSQ
8.1%
LOUP
20.0%

Consumer Defensive

DDSQ
4.9%
LOUP

-

Energy

DDSQ
3.5%
LOUP
2.9%

Utilities

DDSQ
2.3%
LOUP
2.8%

Real Estate

DDSQ
1.9%
LOUP

-

Basic Materials

DDSQ
1.8%
LOUP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDSQ vs. LOUP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDSQ

LOUP
LOUP Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
LOUP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOUP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOUP Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
LOUP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOUP Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDSQ vs. LOUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (DDSQ) and Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DDSQ vs. LOUP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDSQLOUPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.11

0.59

+1.52

Drawdowns

DDSQ vs. LOUP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDSQ drawdown since its inception was -3.69%, smaller than the maximum LOUP drawdown of -58.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDSQ and LOUP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDSQLOUPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.69%

-58.68%

+54.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-1.87%

+1.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.35%

-20.04%

+19.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.19%

Volatility

DDSQ vs. LOUP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDSQLOUPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.76%

28.51%

-16.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.76%

32.38%

-20.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.76%

31.96%

-20.20%

DDSQ vs. LOUP - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDSQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than LOUP's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDSQ vs. LOUP - Dividend Comparison

Neither DDSQ nor LOUP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DDSQ and LOUP have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LOUP is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LOUP is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DDSQ.

DDSQ and LOUP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

DDSQ is categorized as Defined Outcome, while LOUP is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDSQ and 0.70% for LOUP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDSQ and LOUP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer