PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDSQ vs. JANB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDSQ vs. JANB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (DDSQ) and Aptus January Buffer ETF (JANB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DDSQ

1D
0.00%
1M
1.06%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JANB

1D
-0.22%
1M
2.38%
YTD
6.08%
6M
7.10%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDSQ vs. JANB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DDSQ and JANB is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2026

0.83

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDSQ vs. JANB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (DDSQ) and Aptus January Buffer ETF (JANB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DDSQ vs. JANB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDSQJANBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.11

1.97

+0.14

Drawdowns

DDSQ vs. JANB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDSQ drawdown since its inception was -3.69%, smaller than the maximum JANB drawdown of -6.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDSQ and JANB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDSQJANBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.69%

-6.52%

+2.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-0.22%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.35%

-1.14%

+0.79%

Volatility

DDSQ vs. JANB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDSQJANBDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.76%

7.41%

+4.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.76%

7.41%

+4.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.76%

7.41%

+4.35%

DDSQ vs. JANB - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDSQ has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than JANB's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDSQ vs. JANB - Dividend Comparison

Neither DDSQ nor JANB has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DDSQ and JANB have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JANB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JANB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DDSQ.

DDSQ and JANB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDSQ and 0.25% for JANB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDSQ and JANB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer