DDM vs. SPYG
DDM (ProShares Ultra Dow30) and SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DDM is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Industrial Average Index (200%), while SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DDM returned 19.87%/yr vs 17.91%/yr for SPYG. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DDM charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYG.
Performance
DDM vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DDM achieves a 11.15% return, which is significantly higher than SPYG's 9.70% return. Over the past 10 years, DDM has outperformed SPYG with an annualized return of 19.87%, while SPYG has yielded a comparatively lower 17.91% annualized return.
DDM
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- 4.37%
- YTD
- 11.15%
- 6M
- 9.08%
- 1Y
- 41.14%
- 3Y*
- 24.56%
- 5Y*
- 12.67%
- 10Y*
- 19.87%
SPYG
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -2.81%
- YTD
- 9.70%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 29.17%
- 3Y*
- 25.85%
- 5Y*
- 14.92%
- 10Y*
- 17.91%
DDM vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDM ProShares Ultra Dow30 | 11.15% | 20.59% | 21.60% | 24.34% | -19.48% | 41.97% | 2.14% | 47.98% | -13.46% | 59.56% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 9.70% | 22.09% | 35.99% | 30.02% | -29.41% | 32.01% | 33.46% | 30.84% | -0.12% | 27.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDM and SPYG is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2006 | 0.83 |
The correlation between DDM and SPYG shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DDM vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DDM
SPYG
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
DDM
SPYG
Technology
DDM
SPYG
Industrials
DDM
SPYG
Healthcare
DDM
SPYG
Consumer Cyclical
DDM
SPYG
Consumer Defensive
DDM
SPYG
Basic Materials
DDM
SPYG
Energy
DDM
SPYG
Communication Services
DDM
SPYG
Real Estate
DDM
-
SPYG
Utilities
DDM
-
SPYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDM vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank
DDM
SPYG
DDM vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DDM | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.29 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | 2.01 | -0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.86 | 8.08 | -1.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DDM vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDM drawdown since its inception was -81.70%, which is greater than SPYG's maximum drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDM and SPYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDM | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.70% | -67.63% | -14.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.31% | -13.76% | -5.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.62% | -22.14% | -9.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.18% | -32.67% | -7.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.13% | -32.67% | -30.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.61% | -4.65% | +3.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.31% | -24.30% | +6.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.28% | 3.42% | +1.86% |
Volatility
DDM vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM) has a higher volatility of 8.72% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) at 6.33%. This indicates that DDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDM | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.72% | 6.33% | +2.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.64% | 13.48% | +6.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.09% | 16.81% | +8.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.67% | 21.27% | +8.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.81% | 20.70% | +14.11% |
DDM vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDM vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison
DDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, more than SPYG's 0.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDM ProShares Ultra Dow30 | 0.90% | 0.94% | 1.00% | 0.27% | 0.83% | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.62% | 0.89% | 0.68% | 1.08% | 1.23% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.48% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DDM and SPYG have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DDM has higher volatility (8.72%) compared to SPYG (6.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDM dropped -81.70% vs SPYG's -67.63%.
On 10-year performance, DDM leads with 19.87% vs 17.91% for SPYG. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYG has been the lower-risk option at 6.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DDM has performed better with a 19.87% return vs 17.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for DDM.
DDM has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.48% for SPYG.
DDM is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. DDM tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average Index (200%), while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for DDM and 0.04% for SPYG.
SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DDM and SPYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer