PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDM vs. SPYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDM vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDM achieves a 11.15% return, which is significantly higher than SPYG's 9.70% return. Over the past 10 years, DDM has outperformed SPYG with an annualized return of 19.87%, while SPYG has yielded a comparatively lower 17.91% annualized return.


DDM

1D
1.45%
1M
4.37%
YTD
11.15%
6M
9.08%
1Y
41.14%
3Y*
24.56%
5Y*
12.67%
10Y*
19.87%

SPYG

1D
0.41%
1M
-2.81%
YTD
9.70%
6M
10.60%
1Y
29.17%
3Y*
25.85%
5Y*
14.92%
10Y*
17.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDM vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DDM
ProShares Ultra Dow30
11.15%20.59%21.60%24.34%-19.48%41.97%2.14%47.98%-13.46%59.56%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
9.70%22.09%35.99%30.02%-29.41%32.01%33.46%30.84%-0.12%27.24%

Correlation

The correlation between DDM and SPYG is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2006

0.83

The correlation between DDM and SPYG shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DDM vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DDM
SPYG

Financial Services

34.9%
8.4%

Technology

13.3%
53.2%

Industrials

13.0%
5.1%

Healthcare

9.6%
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

7.7%
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
0.9%

Basic Materials

2.7%
0.3%

Energy

1.6%
0.1%

Communication Services

1.3%
16.1%

Real Estate

-

0.5%

Utilities

-

1.1%

Financial Services

DDM
34.9%
SPYG
8.4%

Technology

DDM
13.3%
SPYG
53.2%

Industrials

DDM
13.0%
SPYG
5.1%

Healthcare

DDM
9.6%
SPYG
5.8%

Consumer Cyclical

DDM
7.7%
SPYG
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

DDM
3.0%
SPYG
0.9%

Basic Materials

DDM
2.7%
SPYG
0.3%

Energy

DDM
1.6%
SPYG
0.1%

Communication Services

DDM
1.3%
SPYG
16.1%

Real Estate

DDM

-

SPYG
0.5%

Utilities

DDM

-

SPYG
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDM vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDM
DDM Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
DDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDM Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
DDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDM Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYG
SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDM vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DDMSPYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.29

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

2.01

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.86

8.08

-1.22

DDM vs. SPYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDM Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the SPYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDM and SPYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DDM vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDM drawdown since its inception was -81.70%, which is greater than SPYG's maximum drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDM and SPYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDMSPYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.70%

-67.63%

-14.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.31%

-13.76%

-5.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.62%

-22.14%

-9.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.18%

-32.67%

-7.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.13%

-32.67%

-30.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.61%

-4.65%

+3.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.31%

-24.30%

+6.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.28%

3.42%

+1.86%

Volatility

DDM vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Dow30 (DDM) has a higher volatility of 8.72% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) at 6.33%. This indicates that DDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDMSPYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.72%

6.33%

+2.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.64%

13.48%

+6.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.09%

16.81%

+8.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.67%

21.27%

+8.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.81%

20.70%

+14.11%

DDM vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDM vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison

DDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, more than SPYG's 0.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DDM
ProShares Ultra Dow30
0.90%0.94%1.00%0.27%0.83%0.18%0.31%0.62%0.89%0.68%1.08%1.23%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.48%0.52%0.60%1.15%1.03%0.62%0.90%1.37%1.51%1.41%1.55%1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDM and SPYG have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DDM has higher volatility (8.72%) compared to SPYG (6.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDM dropped -81.70% vs SPYG's -67.63%.

On 10-year performance, DDM leads with 19.87% vs 17.91% for SPYG. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYG has been the lower-risk option at 6.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DDM has performed better with a 19.87% return vs 17.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for DDM.

DDM has the higher dividend yield at 0.90%, compared with 0.48% for SPYG.

DDM is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. DDM tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average Index (200%), while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for DDM and 0.04% for SPYG.

SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDM and SPYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer