PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDIV vs. USVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDIV vs. USVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF (DDIV) and VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DDIV achieves a 14.18% return, which is significantly lower than USVM's 22.48% return.


DDIV

1D
0.39%
1M
3.93%
6M
9.75%
YTD
14.18%
1Y
26.26%
3Y*
20.51%
5Y*
12.00%
10Y*
10.11%
ALL TIME*
9.22%

USVM

1D
1.15%
1M
1.97%
6M
15.40%
YTD
22.48%
1Y
37.25%
3Y*
19.23%
5Y*
11.56%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$943.17K$544.16K$292.85K
$4.36M$4.66M$4.71M

DDIV vs. USVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DDIV
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF
14.18%12.23%27.18%9.95%-12.44%39.96%-3.59%32.40%-16.50%3.28%
USVM
VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF
22.48%10.56%16.59%18.90%-13.23%24.44%11.56%21.65%-9.39%2.06%

Correlation

The correlation between DDIV and USVM is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2017

0.83

The correlation between DDIV and USVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

DDIV vs. USVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DDIV
USVM

Energy

26.5%
5.0%

Financial Services

22.8%
24.6%

Real Estate

15.5%
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

7.3%
3.6%

Industrials

6.8%
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

5.5%
12.3%

Utilities

5.4%
7.3%

Healthcare

4.0%
12.6%

Basic Materials

2.9%
1.7%

Communication Services

2.3%
3.0%

Technology

1.0%
9.6%

Energy

DDIV
26.5%
USVM
5.0%

Financial Services

DDIV
22.8%
USVM
24.6%

Real Estate

DDIV
15.5%
USVM
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

DDIV
7.3%
USVM
3.6%

Industrials

DDIV
6.8%
USVM
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

DDIV
5.5%
USVM
12.3%

Utilities

DDIV
5.4%
USVM
7.3%

Healthcare

DDIV
4.0%
USVM
12.6%

Basic Materials

DDIV
2.9%
USVM
1.7%

Communication Services

DDIV
2.3%
USVM
3.0%

Technology

DDIV
1.0%
USVM
9.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDIV vs. USVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DDIV
DDIV Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
DDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
DDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

USVM
USVM Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
USVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
USVM Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
USVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
USVM Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DDIV vs. USVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF (DDIV) and VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DDIVUSVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.45

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

4.48

-2.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.58

17.35

-8.77

DDIV vs. USVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the USVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDIV and USVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DDIV vs. USVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDIV drawdown since its inception was -47.56%, which is greater than USVM's maximum drawdown of -42.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDIV and USVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDIVUSVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.56%

-42.38%

-5.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.31%

-8.36%

-2.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.97%

-24.34%

+5.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.10%

-25.27%

+4.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.15%

0.00%

-1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.95%

-7.76%

+1.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

2.15%

+0.92%

Volatility

DDIV vs. USVM - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF (DDIV) has a higher volatility of 3.60% compared to VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) at 3.07%. This indicates that DDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDIVUSVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

3.07%

+0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.39%

10.70%

+0.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.42%

14.59%

-0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.25%

19.46%

-1.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.91%

21.86%

-1.95%

DDIV vs. USVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDIV has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than USVM's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDIV vs. USVM - Dividend Comparison

DDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than USVM's 1.80% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DDIV
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF
1.52%1.94%2.22%3.18%3.60%2.43%2.63%2.93%3.27%0.00%
USVM
VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF
1.80%1.84%1.75%1.63%1.43%0.70%1.21%1.77%1.43%0.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDIV and USVM have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DDIV has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to USVM (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDIV dropped -47.56% vs USVM's -42.38%.

On 5-year performance, DDIV leads with 12.00% vs 11.56% for USVM. On fees, USVM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, USVM has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DDIV has performed better with a 12.00% return vs 11.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USVM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DDIV.

USVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 1.52% for DDIV.

DDIV tracks Dorsey Wright Momentum Plus Dividend Yield Index, while USVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Victory. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DDIV and 0.29% for USVM.

USVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDIV and USVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer