PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDIV vs. DFND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDIV vs. DFND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF (DDIV) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, DDIV has outperformed DFND with an annualized return of 9.75%, while DFND has yielded a comparatively lower 7.16% annualized return.


DDIV

1D
0.96%
1M
-1.05%
YTD
7.78%
6M
11.25%
1Y
20.98%
3Y*
20.61%
5Y*
9.41%
10Y*
9.75%

DFND

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
-0.38%
1Y
0.51%
3Y*
7.91%
5Y*
4.73%
10Y*
7.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDIV vs. DFND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DDIV
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF
7.78%12.23%27.18%9.95%-12.44%39.96%-3.59%32.40%-16.50%11.31%
DFND
Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF
0.00%10.37%8.48%12.13%-19.59%14.80%16.12%19.53%-1.83%16.33%

Correlation

The correlation between DDIV and DFND is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2016

0.35

Over the past year, the correlation between DDIV and DFND has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.35, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DDIV vs. DFND - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DDIV
DFND

Energy

27.8%
1.7%

Financial Services

21.5%
18.2%

Real Estate

15.4%
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

7.1%
4.2%

Industrials

7.0%
17.1%

Consumer Cyclical

5.5%
3.5%

Utilities

5.1%

-

Healthcare

3.7%
10.7%

Basic Materials

2.9%
4.3%

Communication Services

2.9%
0.8%

Technology

1.1%
24.8%

Energy

DDIV
27.8%
DFND
1.7%

Financial Services

DDIV
21.5%
DFND
18.2%

Real Estate

DDIV
15.4%
DFND
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

DDIV
7.1%
DFND
4.2%

Industrials

DDIV
7.0%
DFND
17.1%

Consumer Cyclical

DDIV
5.5%
DFND
3.5%

Utilities

DDIV
5.1%
DFND

-

Healthcare

DDIV
3.7%
DFND
10.7%

Basic Materials

DDIV
2.9%
DFND
4.3%

Communication Services

DDIV
2.9%
DFND
0.8%

Technology

DDIV
1.1%
DFND
24.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDIV vs. DFND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDIV
DDIV Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
DDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
DDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

DFND
DFND Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
DFND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFND Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFND Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
DFND Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFND Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDIV vs. DFND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF (DDIV) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DDIVDFNDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.47

0.06

+1.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.10

0.16

+1.94

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.02

+0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

0.89

+0.99

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.96

1.81

+5.15

DDIV vs. DFND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is higher than the DFND Sharpe Ratio of 0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DDIV and DFND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDIVDFNDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.47

0.06

+1.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.22

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.38

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.36

+0.12

Drawdowns

DDIV vs. DFND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDIV drawdown since its inception was -47.56%, which is greater than DFND's maximum drawdown of -22.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDIV and DFND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDIVDFNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.56%

-22.65%

-24.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.31%

-3.44%

-7.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.97%

-12.56%

-6.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.10%

-22.65%

+1.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.56%

-22.65%

-24.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.67%

-3.69%

+2.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.02%

-5.70%

-0.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

3.70%

-0.64%

Volatility

DDIV vs. DFND - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF (DDIV) has a higher volatility of 2.63% compared to Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) at 0.00%. This indicates that DDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDIVDFNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.63%

0.00%

+2.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.73%

6.41%

+5.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.29%

11.01%

+3.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.66%

22.46%

-3.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.91%

19.09%

+0.82%

DDIV vs. DFND - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDIV has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than DFND's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDIV vs. DFND - Dividend Comparison

DDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, more than DFND's 0.62% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DDIV
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momentum & Dividend ETF
1.60%1.94%2.22%3.18%3.60%2.43%2.63%2.93%3.27%0.00%
DFND
Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF
0.62%1.10%1.64%1.84%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.77%0.53%0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


DDIV and DFND have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DDIV has higher volatility (2.63%) compared to DFND (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DDIV dropped -47.56% vs DFND's -22.65%.

On 10-year performance, DDIV leads with 9.75% vs 7.16% for DFND. On fees, DDIV is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, DFND has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DDIV has performed better with a 9.75% return vs 7.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DDIV is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DFND.

DDIV has the higher dividend yield at 1.60%, compared with 0.62% for DFND.

DDIV is categorized as Momentum, while DFND is Large Cap Blend Equities. DDIV tracks Dorsey Wright Momentum Plus Dividend Yield Index, while DFND tracks Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and SRN Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DDIV and 1.50% for DFND.

DDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDIV and DFND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer