DDFY vs. QFLR
DDFY (Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - May) and QFLR (Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DDFY is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, while QFLR is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Innovator. DDFY is passively managed, while QFLR is actively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DDFY charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for QFLR.
Performance
DDFY vs. QFLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DDFY
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QFLR
- 1D
- -3.63%
- 1M
- -1.45%
- YTD
- 2.95%
- 6M
- 1.73%
- 1Y
- 22.36%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DDFY vs. QFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DDFY Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - May | 0.63% |
QFLR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF | -0.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDFY and QFLR is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2026 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDFY vs. QFLR — Risk / Return Rank
DDFY
QFLR
DDFY vs. QFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - May (DDFY) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DDFY | QFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.68 | 1.22 | +0.45 |
Drawdowns
DDFY vs. QFLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDFY drawdown since its inception was -1.05%, smaller than the maximum QFLR drawdown of -13.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDFY and QFLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDFY | QFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.05% | -13.97% | +12.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.05% | -4.16% | +3.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.14% | -2.50% | +2.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.80% | — |
Volatility
DDFY vs. QFLR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDFY | QFLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.48% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.87% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.17% | 11.87% | -7.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.17% | 12.83% | -8.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.17% | 12.83% | -8.66% |
DDFY vs. QFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDFY has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than QFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDFY vs. QFLR - Dividend Comparison
Neither DDFY nor QFLR has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
DDFY Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - May | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QFLR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DDFY and QFLR have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DDFY is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DDFY is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for QFLR.
DDFY and QFLR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
DDFY is categorized as Defined Outcome, while QFLR is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDFY and 0.89% for QFLR.
Find the right allocation for DDFY and QFLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer