PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DDFY vs. FBUF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DDFY vs. FBUF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - May (DDFY) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DDFY

1D
-0.82%
1M
0.18%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FBUF

1D
-1.97%
1M
0.41%
YTD
3.46%
6M
4.08%
1Y
17.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DDFY vs. FBUF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DDFY and FBUF is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2026

0.72

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DDFY vs. FBUF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DDFY

FBUF
FBUF Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DDFY vs. FBUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - May (DDFY) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DDFY vs. FBUF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DDFYFBUFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.68

1.35

+0.33

Drawdowns

DDFY vs. FBUF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DDFY drawdown since its inception was -1.05%, smaller than the maximum FBUF drawdown of -11.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDFY and FBUF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DDFYFBUFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.05%

-11.09%

+10.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.05%

-1.98%

+0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.14%

-1.37%

+1.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.26%

Volatility

DDFY vs. FBUF - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DDFYFBUFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.17%

7.76%

-3.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.17%

9.63%

-5.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.17%

9.63%

-5.46%

DDFY vs. FBUF - Expense Ratio Comparison

DDFY has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FBUF's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

DDFY vs. FBUF - Dividend Comparison

DDFY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DDFY and FBUF have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FBUF is cheaper at 0.48% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FBUF is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for DDFY.

FBUF has the higher dividend yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.00% for DDFY.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for DDFY and 0.48% for FBUF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DDFY and FBUF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer