DDDD vs. YMAG
DDDD (YieldMax U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF) and YMAG (YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DDDD charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.28%/yr for YMAG.
Performance
DDDD vs. YMAG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DDDD
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YMAG
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 2.17%
- YTD
- 4.47%
- 6M
- 4.69%
- 1Y
- 27.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DDDD vs. YMAG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DDDD YieldMax U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF | 5.08% |
YMAG YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs | 10.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between DDDD and YMAG is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2026 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DDDD vs. YMAG — Risk / Return Rank
DDDD
YMAG
DDDD vs. YMAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF (DDDD) and YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DDDD | YMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.55 | 1.20 | +1.34 |
Drawdowns
DDDD vs. YMAG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DDDD drawdown since its inception was -1.88%, smaller than the maximum YMAG drawdown of -25.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DDDD and YMAG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DDDD | YMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.88% | -25.96% | +24.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.22% | -2.08% | +0.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.60% | -4.52% | +3.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.09% | — |
Volatility
DDDD vs. YMAG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DDDD | YMAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.69% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.53% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.69% | 16.19% | -6.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.69% | 20.87% | -11.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.69% | 20.87% | -11.18% |
DDDD vs. YMAG - Expense Ratio Comparison
DDDD has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than YMAG's 1.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
DDDD vs. YMAG - Dividend Comparison
DDDD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while YMAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 51.83%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
DDDD YieldMax U.S. Stocks Target Double Distribution ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
YMAG YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs | 51.83% | 52.27% | 35.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DDDD and YMAG have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DDDD is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DDDD is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for YMAG.
YMAG has the higher dividend yield at 51.83%, compared with 0.00% for DDDD.
Their fees differ too: 0.99% for DDDD and 1.28% for YMAG.
Find the right allocation for DDDD and YMAG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer