DBX9.DE vs. XCS7.DE
DBX9.DE (Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C) and XCS7.DE (Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D) are both China Equities funds from Xtrackers - DBX9.DE tracks the FTSE China 50 while XCS7.DE tracks the MSCI China. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DBX9.DE returned 13.37%/yr vs 7.69%/yr for XCS7.DE. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DBX9.DE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for XCS7.DE.
Performance
DBX9.DE vs. XCS7.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBX9.DE achieves a 9.85% return, which is significantly higher than XCS7.DE's -6.89% return.
DBX9.DE
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 1.75%
- YTD
- 9.85%
- 6M
- 13.25%
- 1Y
- 32.77%
- 3Y*
- 13.37%
- 5Y*
- 0.17%
- 10Y*
- 3.94%
XCS7.DE
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -1.94%
- YTD
- -6.89%
- 6M
- -8.38%
- 1Y
- 2.79%
- 3Y*
- 7.69%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBX9.DE vs. XCS7.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBX9.DE Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C | 9.85% | 10.01% | 37.68% | -16.44% | 1.40% |
XCS7.DE Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D | -6.89% | 16.53% | 27.49% | -14.73% | 4.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBX9.DE and XCS7.DE is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2022 | 0.90 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DBX9.DE and XCS7.DE has dropped to 0.65 - well below their long-term average of 0.90, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBX9.DE vs. XCS7.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DBX9.DE
XCS7.DE
DBX9.DE vs. XCS7.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C (DBX9.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D (XCS7.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBX9.DE | XCS7.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.04 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 0.16 | +1.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.67 | 0.34 | +3.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBX9.DE | XCS7.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | 0.15 | +1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | 0.20 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
DBX9.DE vs. XCS7.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBX9.DE drawdown since its inception was -66.51%, which is greater than XCS7.DE's maximum drawdown of -36.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBX9.DE and XCS7.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBX9.DE | XCS7.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.51% | -36.62% | -29.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.20% | -17.01% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.83% | -24.53% | -3.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.62% | -14.97% | +0.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.50% | -15.59% | -13.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.91% | 8.18% | +0.73% |
Volatility
DBX9.DE vs. XCS7.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C (DBX9.DE) is 5.29%, while Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D (XCS7.DE) has a volatility of 7.33%. This indicates that DBX9.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCS7.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBX9.DE | XCS7.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.29% | 7.33% | -2.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.45% | 13.19% | -2.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.35% | 18.48% | +7.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.75% | 25.65% | +3.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.42% | 25.65% | -0.23% |
DBX9.DE vs. XCS7.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBX9.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XCS7.DE's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBX9.DE vs. XCS7.DE - Dividend Comparison
DBX9.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XCS7.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DBX9.DE Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XCS7.DE Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D | 2.11% | 2.35% | 2.05% | 3.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBX9.DE and XCS7.DE have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XCS7.DE is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XCS7.DE is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DBX9.DE.
DBX9.DE tracks FTSE China 50, while XCS7.DE tracks MSCI China. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DBX9.DE and 0.28% for XCS7.DE.
Find the right allocation for DBX9.DE and XCS7.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer