DBX9.DE vs. 36BZ.DE
DBX9.DE (Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C) and 36BZ.DE (iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF) are both China Equities funds - DBX9.DE tracks the FTSE China 50 while 36BZ.DE tracks the MSCI China A Inclusion. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBX9.DE returned 3.94%/yr vs 5.98%/yr for 36BZ.DE. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DBX9.DE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for 36BZ.DE.
Performance
DBX9.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DBX9.DE having a 9.85% return and 36BZ.DE slightly lower at 9.71%. Over the past 10 years, DBX9.DE has underperformed 36BZ.DE with an annualized return of 3.94%, while 36BZ.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 5.98% annualized return.
DBX9.DE
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 9.85%
- 6M
- 11.95%
- 1Y
- 33.01%
- 3Y*
- 13.37%
- 5Y*
- 0.17%
- 10Y*
- 3.94%
36BZ.DE
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 9.71%
- 6M
- 11.84%
- 1Y
- 33.04%
- 3Y*
- 8.44%
- 5Y*
- -0.23%
- 10Y*
- 5.98%
DBX9.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBX9.DE Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C | 9.85% | 10.01% | 37.68% | -16.44% | -13.62% | -14.98% | -0.87% | 18.35% | -9.23% | 18.88% |
36BZ.DE iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF | 9.71% | 10.25% | 19.91% | -17.13% | -21.26% | 13.41% | 28.50% | 37.21% | -23.49% | 14.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBX9.DE and 36BZ.DE is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2015 | 0.72 |
Over the past year, DBX9.DE and 36BZ.DE have become more correlated (0.95) than their long-term average of 0.72, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBX9.DE vs. 36BZ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DBX9.DE
36BZ.DE
DBX9.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C (DBX9.DE) and iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (36BZ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBX9.DE | 36BZ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.38 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 5.10 | -3.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.67 | 13.77 | -10.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBX9.DE | 36BZ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | 2.11 | -0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | -0.01 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 | 0.27 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | 0.03 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
DBX9.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBX9.DE drawdown since its inception was -66.51%, which is greater than 36BZ.DE's maximum drawdown of -53.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBX9.DE and 36BZ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBX9.DE | 36BZ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.51% | -53.30% | -13.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.20% | -6.57% | -10.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.83% | -28.01% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.59% | -41.94% | -5.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.98% | -43.38% | -10.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.62% | -10.22% | -4.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.50% | -30.19% | +0.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.91% | 2.44% | +6.47% |
Volatility
DBX9.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C (DBX9.DE) and iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (36BZ.DE) have volatilities of 5.29% and 5.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBX9.DE | 36BZ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.29% | 5.55% | -0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.45% | 10.96% | -0.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.35% | 15.83% | +10.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.75% | 21.44% | +7.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.42% | 22.10% | +3.32% |
DBX9.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBX9.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than 36BZ.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBX9.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither DBX9.DE nor 36BZ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, DBX9.DE and 36BZ.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, 36BZ.DE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
36BZ.DE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DBX9.DE.
DBX9.DE tracks FTSE China 50, while 36BZ.DE tracks MSCI China A Inclusion. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DBX9.DE and 0.40% for 36BZ.DE.
Find the right allocation for DBX9.DE and 36BZ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer