36BZ.DE vs. H4ZP.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (36BZ.DE) and HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF USD (H4ZP.DE).
36BZ.DE and H4ZP.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. 36BZ.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Inclusion. It was launched on Apr 8, 2015. H4ZP.DE is a passively managed fund by HSBC that tracks the performance of the MSCI China. It was launched on Jan 26, 2011. Both 36BZ.DE and H4ZP.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: 36BZ.DE or H4ZP.DE.
Performance
36BZ.DE vs. H4ZP.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
36BZ.DE:
0.33
H4ZP.DE:
0.80
36BZ.DE:
0.74
H4ZP.DE:
1.33
36BZ.DE:
1.11
H4ZP.DE:
1.18
36BZ.DE:
0.24
H4ZP.DE:
0.50
36BZ.DE:
0.64
H4ZP.DE:
2.46
36BZ.DE:
16.18%
H4ZP.DE:
10.25%
36BZ.DE:
28.61%
H4ZP.DE:
30.06%
36BZ.DE:
-53.30%
H4ZP.DE:
-55.74%
36BZ.DE:
-32.59%
H4ZP.DE:
-34.27%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, 36BZ.DE achieves a -9.18% return, which is significantly lower than H4ZP.DE's 4.04% return. Over the past 10 years, 36BZ.DE has underperformed H4ZP.DE with an annualized return of -0.84%, while H4ZP.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 2.13% annualized return.
36BZ.DE
- YTD
- -9.18%
- 1M
- 0.01%
- 6M
- -4.12%
- 1Y
- 9.56%
- 3Y*
- -9.65%
- 5Y*
- -2.98%
- 10Y*
- -0.84%
H4ZP.DE
- YTD
- 4.04%
- 1M
- -1.46%
- 6M
- 6.53%
- 1Y
- 24.22%
- 3Y*
- -1.79%
- 5Y*
- -3.95%
- 10Y*
- 2.13%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
36BZ.DE vs. H4ZP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
36BZ.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than H4ZP.DE's 0.28% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
36BZ.DE vs. H4ZP.DE — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
36BZ.DE
H4ZP.DE
36BZ.DE vs. H4ZP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (36BZ.DE) and HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF USD (H4ZP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Correlation
The correlation between 36BZ.DE and H4ZP.DE is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
36BZ.DE vs. H4ZP.DE - Dividend Comparison
36BZ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while H4ZP.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
36BZ.DE iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
H4ZP.DE HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF USD | 3.07% | 2.96% | 2.10% | 1.97% | 1.28% | 0.96% | 1.57% | 1.40% | 0.78% | 1.97% | 2.89% | 1.62% |
Drawdowns
36BZ.DE vs. H4ZP.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum 36BZ.DE drawdown since its inception was -53.30%, roughly equal to the maximum H4ZP.DE drawdown of -55.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 36BZ.DE and H4ZP.DE.
Loading data...
Volatility
36BZ.DE vs. H4ZP.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (36BZ.DE) is 2.61%, while HSBC MSCI China UCITS ETF USD (H4ZP.DE) has a volatility of 4.34%. This indicates that 36BZ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than H4ZP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...