PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBP vs. GLTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBP vs. GLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund (DBP) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBP achieves a 2.13% return, which is significantly higher than GLTR's 1.47% return. Over the past 10 years, DBP has underperformed GLTR with an annualized return of 12.31%, while GLTR has yielded a comparatively higher 13.17% annualized return.


DBP

1D
-1.42%
1M
-1.48%
YTD
2.13%
6M
8.68%
1Y
42.65%
3Y*
32.54%
5Y*
17.43%
10Y*
12.31%

GLTR

1D
-1.81%
1M
-1.45%
YTD
1.47%
6M
10.73%
1Y
53.06%
3Y*
32.36%
5Y*
15.32%
10Y*
13.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBP vs. GLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBP
Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund
2.13%73.43%26.71%8.68%-1.51%-7.10%26.79%15.89%-4.31%10.58%
GLTR
Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF
1.47%87.25%20.63%2.01%-0.25%-9.60%29.52%20.96%-2.85%12.94%

Correlation

The correlation between DBP and GLTR is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2010

0.95

The correlation between DBP and GLTR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBP vs. GLTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBP
DBP Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
DBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBP Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
DBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBP Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

GLTR
GLTR Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
GLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
GLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBP vs. GLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund (DBP) and Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DBPGLTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.29

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

1.80

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.01

4.13

-0.12

DBP vs. GLTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBP Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the GLTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBP and GLTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DBPGLTRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

1.42

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.65

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.64

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.32

+0.11

Drawdowns

DBP vs. GLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBP drawdown since its inception was -53.89%, roughly equal to the maximum GLTR drawdown of -55.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBP and GLTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBPGLTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.89%

-55.70%

+1.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.48%

-29.70%

+4.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.48%

-29.70%

+4.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.48%

-29.70%

+4.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.36%

-29.70%

+1.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.04%

-26.86%

+3.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.42%

-28.83%

+3.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.67%

12.88%

-2.21%

Volatility

DBP vs. GLTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund (DBP) is 7.57%, while Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) has a volatility of 9.13%. This indicates that DBP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBPGLTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.57%

9.13%

-1.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.87%

35.41%

-5.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.57%

37.58%

-5.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.91%

23.63%

-2.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.72%

20.50%

-1.78%

DBP vs. GLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBP has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than GLTR's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBP vs. GLTR - Dividend Comparison

DBP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, while GLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBP
Invesco DB Precious Metals Fund
2.38%2.44%4.21%4.47%0.45%0.00%0.00%1.26%1.24%0.12%
GLTR
Aberdeen Standard Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, DBP and GLTR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GLTR has higher volatility (9.13%) compared to DBP (7.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBP dropped -53.89% vs GLTR's -55.70%.

On 10-year performance, GLTR leads with 13.17% vs 12.31% for DBP. On fees, GLTR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, DBP has been the lower-risk option at 7.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GLTR has performed better with a 13.17% return vs 12.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GLTR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBP.

DBP has the higher dividend yield at 2.38%, compared with 0.00% for GLTR.

DBP tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Precious Metals Index Excess Return, while GLTR tracks ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Aberdeen. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for DBP and 0.60% for GLTR.

GLTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBP and GLTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer