PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBMF vs. QTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DBMF vs. QTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DBMF vs. QTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DBMF
iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF
7.87%13.85%7.24%-8.94%21.61%1.76%
QTR
Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF
-7.25%14.52%21.46%45.53%-29.94%4.16%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBMF achieves a 7.87% return, which is significantly higher than QTR's -7.25% return.


DBMF

1D
-0.20%
1M
-3.82%
YTD
7.87%
6M
15.44%
1Y
26.29%
3Y*
9.90%
5Y*
8.63%
10Y*

QTR

1D
1.82%
1M
-5.65%
YTD
-7.25%
6M
-6.08%
1Y
16.96%
3Y*
17.17%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DBMF vs. QTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBMF has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than QTR's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DBMF vs. QTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBMF
DBMF Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
DBMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBMF Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
DBMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBMF Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

QTR
QTR Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
QTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTR Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
QTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTR Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBMF vs. QTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DBMFQTRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.19

1.04

+1.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.98

1.56

+1.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.20

+0.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.25

1.36

+2.90

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.51

4.83

+13.67

DBMF vs. QTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBMF Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is higher than the QTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBMF and QTR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DBMFQTRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

1.04

+1.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.39

+0.34

Correlation

The correlation between DBMF and QTR is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

DBMF vs. QTR - Dividend Comparison

DBMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.30%, less than QTR's 20.24% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
DBMF
iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF
5.30%5.91%5.75%2.91%7.72%10.38%0.86%9.35%
QTR
Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF
20.24%18.77%0.50%0.53%0.36%1.90%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

DBMF vs. QTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBMF drawdown since its inception was -20.39%, smaller than the maximum QTR drawdown of -31.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBMF and QTR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DBMFQTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.39%

-31.72%

+11.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.10%

-12.29%

+6.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.82%

-10.69%

+6.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.70%

-9.10%

+2.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.40%

3.45%

-2.05%

Volatility

DBMF vs. QTR - Volatility Comparison

iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) has a higher volatility of 5.24% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) at 4.90%. This indicates that DBMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DBMFQTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.24%

4.90%

+0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.10%

10.80%

+0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.09%

16.44%

-4.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.66%

18.16%

-5.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.48%

18.16%

-5.68%