QTR vs. PTLC
QTR (Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF) and PTLC (Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QTR is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Protective Put 90 Index, while PTLC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer Trendpilot U.S. Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QTR returned 23.03%/yr vs 15.22%/yr for PTLC. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.
Performance
QTR vs. PTLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QTR achieves a 17.92% return, which is significantly higher than PTLC's 6.32% return.
QTR
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 10.53%
- YTD
- 17.92%
- 6M
- 16.22%
- 1Y
- 35.27%
- 3Y*
- 23.03%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PTLC
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 5.37%
- YTD
- 6.32%
- 6M
- 6.63%
- 1Y
- 23.09%
- 3Y*
- 15.22%
- 5Y*
- 11.08%
- 10Y*
- 11.35%
QTR vs. PTLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTR Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF | 17.92% | 14.52% | 21.46% | 45.53% | -29.94% | 4.16% |
PTLC Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF | 6.32% | 5.10% | 24.31% | 16.78% | -8.62% | 6.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between QTR and PTLC is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2021 | 0.71 |
Over the past year, QTR and PTLC have become more correlated (0.92) than their long-term average of 0.71, meaning their price movements have been converging.
QTR vs. PTLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QTR
PTLC
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
QTR
PTLC
Communication Services
QTR
PTLC
Consumer Cyclical
QTR
PTLC
Consumer Defensive
QTR
PTLC
Healthcare
QTR
PTLC
Industrials
QTR
PTLC
Utilities
QTR
PTLC
Basic Materials
QTR
PTLC
Energy
QTR
PTLC
Financial Services
QTR
PTLC
Real Estate
QTR
PTLC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QTR vs. PTLC — Risk / Return Rank
QTR
PTLC
QTR vs. PTLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) and Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QTR | PTLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.51 | 2.06 | +0.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.34 | 2.74 | +0.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.37 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | 2.69 | +0.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.09 | 10.69 | -0.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QTR | PTLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.51 | 2.06 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.95 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.71 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
QTR vs. PTLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTR drawdown since its inception was -31.72%, which is greater than PTLC's maximum drawdown of -26.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTR and PTLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTR | PTLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.72% | -26.63% | -5.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.29% | -8.77% | -3.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.99% | -15.17% | -3.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -15.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.85% | -5.65% | -3.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.57% | 2.21% | +1.36% |
Volatility
QTR vs. PTLC - Volatility Comparison
Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC) at 2.77%. This indicates that QTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PTLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QTR | PTLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.52% | 2.77% | +1.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.68% | 8.13% | +2.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.15% | 11.25% | +2.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.11% | 11.73% | +6.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.11% | 13.17% | +4.94% |
QTR vs. PTLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both QTR and PTLC have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Dividends
QTR vs. PTLC - Dividend Comparison
QTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.92%, more than PTLC's 1.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTLC Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF | 1.00% | 1.06% | 0.67% | 1.18% | 1.26% | 0.73% | 1.08% | 1.10% | 1.00% | 0.97% | 1.08% | 0.42% |
QTR Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF | 15.92% | 18.77% | 0.50% | 0.53% | 0.36% | 1.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, QTR and PTLC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
QTR has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to PTLC (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTR dropped -31.72% vs PTLC's -26.63%.
On 3-year performance, QTR leads with 23.03% vs 15.22% for PTLC. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, PTLC has been the lower-risk option at 2.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, QTR has performed better with a 23.03% return vs 15.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QTR and PTLC have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.
QTR has the higher dividend yield at 15.92%, compared with 1.00% for PTLC.
QTR is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while PTLC is Large Cap Blend Equities. QTR tracks NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Protective Put 90 Index, while PTLC tracks Pacer Trendpilot U.S. Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Pacer.
QTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QTR and PTLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer