DBMF vs. JPFP
DBMF (iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF) and JPFP (JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF) are both Systematic Trend funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DBMF charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for JPFP.
Performance
DBMF vs. JPFP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DBMF
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 2.35%
- YTD
- 12.42%
- 6M
- 14.20%
- 1Y
- 31.40%
- 3Y*
- 10.81%
- 5Y*
- 8.46%
- 10Y*
- —
JPFP
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBMF vs. JPFP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 1.22% |
JPFP JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF | 1.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBMF and JPFP is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBMF vs. JPFP — Risk / Return Rank
DBMF
JPFP
DBMF vs. JPFP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) and JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF (JPFP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBMF | JPFP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.17 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.07 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBMF | JPFP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 9.75 | -8.97 |
Drawdowns
DBMF vs. JPFP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBMF drawdown since its inception was -20.39%, which is greater than JPFP's maximum drawdown of -0.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBMF and JPFP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBMF | JPFP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.39% | -0.76% | -19.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.10% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.76% | +0.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.59% | -0.19% | -6.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.65% | — | — |
Volatility
DBMF vs. JPFP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBMF | JPFP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.12% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.76% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.17% | 11.39% | +0.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.52% | 11.39% | +1.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.41% | 11.39% | +1.02% |
DBMF vs. JPFP - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBMF has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than JPFP's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBMF vs. JPFP - Dividend Comparison
DBMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%, while JPFP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 5.09% | 5.91% | 5.75% | 2.91% | 7.72% | 10.38% | 0.86% | 9.35% |
JPFP JPMorgan Managed Futures Plus ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBMF and JPFP have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JPFP is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JPFP is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DBMF.
DBMF has the higher dividend yield at 5.09%, compared with 0.00% for JPFP.
They also come from different issuers: iM Global Partners and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DBMF and 0.59% for JPFP.
Find the right allocation for DBMF and JPFP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer